Re: [Qemu-devel] VNC Websocket TLS support design decisions

[Tim Hardeck]

Hi,

I have sent in my current implementation some minutes ago.

On 04/11/2013 03:33 PM, Tim Hardeck wrote:

> Websockets over TLS need certificates.
> We already have the "x509" vnc parameter for VNC-TLS to provide the
> certificates but user might have one webserver certificate and one for
> VNC TLS authentication. Of course in this case they could use two vnc
> instances.
> The other issue is that Websockets TLS should work when vnc-tls is
> disabled since GnuTLS is already a requirement for Websockets anyway.
> Should I use this x509 certificate parameter also or add an additional
> parameter like "ws_x509"?
In my current implementation the general "x509" vnc parameter is used to 
provide the path for the certificates.

> Should there be an option to only allow Websockets over TLS?
> For example how to react in case of the option "tls=1".
> In my current implementation the Websocket connection is checked during
> initiation for an encryption handshake and and then acted accordingly.
If "tls" is specified Websockets can't be used because VEncrypt is 
enforced then which is not supported by noVNC.

In general VNC TLS is decrypted before the Websocket decoding so it 
can't be stacked atm. I don't think that it is needed anyway since there 
is Websocket TLS support now but there might be HTML 5 clients with 
VEncrypt support in the future.

I haven't added any option to only allow encrypted Websockets 
connections [yet]. Let me know if this is worth adding another VNC option.

> To my knowledge current HTML5 VNC clients do not support another
> authentication then password, so no VEncrypt.
> This means that if I enable tls=1 Websockets connection can't be
> established for this vnc instance.
> Should I add some workaround to use password authentication for
> Websockets or just document it so users could use two vnc instances for
> this use case?
If "tls=1" is specified noVNC shows the message that this security type 
is not supported which should be fine I suppose.

> For my implementation I am using many parts of vnc-tls. I am planning to
> make some functions in vnc-tls more flexible or add some checks to allow
> them to be used for Websocket TLS connections.
> Would this be OK or do you have other suggestions.
I got rid of all duplicates except of the functions regarding the TLS 
handshake which I imported from vnc-auth-vencrypt.c.

Regards
Tim

--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix 
Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
T: +49 (0) 911 74053-0  F: +49 (0) 911 74053-483
http://www.suse.de/