qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 4/7] rdma: core logic


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 4/7] rdma: core logic
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:09:27 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4

Il 17/04/2013 13:20, Orit Wasserman ha scritto:
>> +/*
>> + * Virtual address of the above structures used for transmitting
>> + * the RAMBlock descriptions at connection-time.
>> + */
>> +typedef struct RDMALocalBlocks {
>> +    int num_blocks;
>> +    RDMALocalBlock *block;
>> +} RDMALocalBlocks;
>> +
> 
> Why not use some glib container?
> If you need to find a block by offset it will be more simple and efficient.

I think it's okay, the num_blocks is small and static.

>> +static int qemu_rdma_connect(RDMAContext *rdma, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    RDMAControlHeader head;
>> +    RDMACapabilities cap = {
>> +                                .version = RDMA_CONTROL_VERSION_CURRENT,
>> +                                .flags = 0,
>> +                           };
>> +    struct rdma_conn_param conn_param = { .initiator_depth = 2,
>> +                                          .retry_count = 5,
>> +                                          .private_data = &cap,
>> +                                          .private_data_len = sizeof(cap),
>> +                                        };
>> +    struct rdma_cm_event *cm_event;
>> +    int ret;
>> +    int idx = 0;
>> +    int x;
>> +
>> +    if (rdma->chunk_register_destination) {
>> +        printf("Server dynamic registration requested.\n");
> 
> Debug ?

Right, please remove.

>> +        cap.flags |= RDMA_CAPABILITY_CHUNK_REGISTER;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    caps_to_network(&cap);
>> +
>> +    ret = rdma_connect(rdma->cm_id, &conn_param);
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +        perror("rdma_connect");
> 
> Please use errp and set it ...

All good catches with errp, I completely missed it in my review!

Thanks,

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]