[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] vmdk: add bdrv_co_write_zeroes
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] vmdk: add bdrv_co_write_zeroes |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:20:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:44:35PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> @@ -905,6 +905,13 @@ static int get_cluster_offset(BlockDriverState *bs,
> l2_index = ((offset >> 9) / extent->cluster_sectors) % extent->l2_size;
> *cluster_offset = le32_to_cpu(l2_table[l2_index]);
>
> + if (m_data) {
> + m_data->valid = 1;
> + m_data->l1_index = l1_index;
> + m_data->l2_index = l2_index;
> + m_data->offset = *cluster_offset;
> + m_data->l2_offset = extent->l1_table[m_data->l1_index];
This line can simply be:
m_data->l2_offset = l2_offset;
> + }
Filling in m_data up here means that only the ->offset field needs to be
filled in when we allocate a cluster further down. Right now the code
is duplicated, but it just overwrites the fields with the same value
again.
> @@ -1222,17 +1238,34 @@ static int vmdk_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t
> sector_num,
> if (n > nb_sectors) {
> n = nb_sectors;
> }
> -
> - ret = vmdk_write_extent(extent,
> - cluster_offset, index_in_cluster * 512,
> - buf, n, sector_num);
> - if (ret) {
> - return ret;
> - }
> - if (m_data.valid) {
> - /* update L2 tables */
> - if (vmdk_L2update(extent, &m_data) == -1) {
> - return -EIO;
> + if (zeroed) {
> + /* Do zeroed write, buf is ignored */
> + if (extent->has_zero_grain &&
> + index_in_cluster == 0 &&
> + n >= extent->cluster_sectors) {
> + n = extent->cluster_sectors;
> + if (!zero_dry_run) {
> + m_data.offset = cpu_to_le32(VMDK_GTE_ZEROED);
offset is host endian now!
> + /* update L2 tables */
> + if (vmdk_L2update(extent, &m_data) != VMDK_OK) {
Zeroing cluster-by-cluster is slow - vmdk_L2update() uses sync to flush
the L2 update. The vmdk.c code isn't great for buffering up metadata
changes and flushing them in a single operation though, so this is fine
for now.
> + return -EIO;
> + }
l2_cache[] has not been updated with the new VMDK_GTE_ZEROED offset.
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] vmdk: zeroed-grain GTE support, Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] vmdk: named return code., Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] vmdk: Add option to create zeroed-grain image, Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] vmdk: change magic number to macro, Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] vmdk: add support for “zeroed‐grain” GTE, Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] vmdk: store fields of VmdkMetaData in cpu endian, Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] vmdk: add bdrv_co_write_zeroes, Fam Zheng, 2013/04/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] vmdk: add bdrv_co_write_zeroes,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] vmdk: zeroed-grain GTE support, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2013/04/25