qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] vfio: Move container list to DMAContext


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] vfio: Move container list to DMAContext
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:52:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4

Il 26/04/2013 10:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> On 04/26/2013 06:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 25/04/2013 08:36, David Gibson ha scritto:
>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:33:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> Il 24/04/2013 17:12, Alex Williamson ha scritto:
>>>>>>> At the moment, vfio maintains a global list of containers
>>>>>>> that are assumed to be more or less interchangeable, since
>>>>>>> they are all set up with a MemoryListener to have all of
>>>>>>> system memory mapped.  However, that only makes sense if
>>>>>>> all the containers are used on devices which really do
>>>>>>> expect a dma address space identical to system memory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch moves towards that by making the list of
>>>>>>> containers per DMAContext (which corresponds to a dma
>>>>>>> address space) instead of global.
>>>>> This seems like an unnecessary intrusion into common code.  Why
>>>>> not create a vfio specific list of dma objects, each with a
>>>>> list of containers?  Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I suggest that this is re-evaluated on top of the iommu
>>>> patches.
>>>
>>>> You can find them at git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git, branch
>>>> iommu. It seems to work with pseries, at least my guest crashes
>>>> at the same place with and without.  USB works, and so do VGA and
>>>> spapr-vscsi.
>>>
>>> Ok, I'll have a look when I get a chance.  Any guesses as to when
>>> they might reach mainline?
>>
>> If I get your Tested-by, early in 1.6.
> 
> Emulated PCI works on ppc64/spapr so far.

What about VIO?  Doesn't it go through the IOMMU as well?  I'm sure you
can test it more than I did (it did break in Avi's original patches, so
it must not be that bad...).

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]