qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/10] S390: Pass per-device loadparm values for


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/10] S390: Pass per-device loadparm values for CCW blk and net devs.
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:14:27 +0200

On 26.04.2013, at 20:08, Dominik Dingel wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:48 +0200
> Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 26.04.2013, at 14:12, Dominik Dingel wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Christian Paro <address@hidden>
>>> 
>>> Provide a loadparm property which can be used to pass IPL load
>>> parameters on a per-device basis for VirtioCcwDevice instances
>>> representing block and network devices.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Paro <address@hidden>
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
>>> index 56539d3..23d042f 100644
>>> --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
>>> @@ -791,6 +791,7 @@ static const VirtIOBindings virtio_ccw_bindings = {
>>> 
>>> static Property virtio_ccw_net_properties[] = {
>>>    DEFINE_PROP_STRING("devno", VirtioCcwDevice, bus_id),
>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("loadparm", VirtioCcwDevice, loadparm, 0),
>> 
>> We don't support netboot yet, right? Also is "loadparm" an architected name? 
>> Wouldn't "bootmap_id" or something that actually tells the user what's going 
>> on fit better?
>> 
>> 
>> Alex
> 
> Christian had the idea to name it subindex, but I don't know, to be honest, I 
> like the general open solution more, especially for the commandline 
> interface. What if we later on want to change the behaviour, loadparm, or 
> better biosparameter is so general... where bootmap_id is narrowed down.

How about you guys make up your mind first what you really want to describe and 
which use cases you want to cover? :)


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]