qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MSI: Swap payload to native endianness


From: Scott Wood
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MSI: Swap payload to native endianness
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:48:28 -0500

From: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>

The usual MSI injection mechanism writes msi.data into memory using an
le32 wrapper. So on big endian guests, this swaps msg.data into the
expected byte order.

For irqfd however, we don't swap the payload right now, rendering
in-kernel MPIC emulation broken on PowerPC.

Swap msg.data to the correct endianness whenever we touch it.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
---
>From Scott: This patch makes me wonder why we have four different open
coded instances of putting information from MSIMessage into struct
kvm_irq_routing_msi...
---
 kvm-all.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 296ed0c..7e74939 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static KVMMSIRoute *kvm_lookup_msi_route(KVMState *s, 
MSIMessage msg)
     QTAILQ_FOREACH(route, &s->msi_hashtab[hash], entry) {
         if (route->kroute.u.msi.address_lo == (uint32_t)msg.address &&
             route->kroute.u.msi.address_hi == (msg.address >> 32) &&
-            route->kroute.u.msi.data == msg.data) {
+            route->kroute.u.msi.data == le32_to_cpu(msg.data)) {
             return route;
         }
     }
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ int kvm_irqchip_send_msi(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
     if (s->direct_msi) {
         msi.address_lo = (uint32_t)msg.address;
         msi.address_hi = msg.address >> 32;
-        msi.data = msg.data;
+        msi.data = le32_to_cpu(msg.data);
         msi.flags = 0;
         memset(msi.pad, 0, sizeof(msi.pad));
 
@@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ int kvm_irqchip_send_msi(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
         route->kroute.flags = 0;
         route->kroute.u.msi.address_lo = (uint32_t)msg.address;
         route->kroute.u.msi.address_hi = msg.address >> 32;
-        route->kroute.u.msi.data = msg.data;
+        route->kroute.u.msi.data = le32_to_cpu(msg.data);
 
         kvm_add_routing_entry(s, &route->kroute);
 
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
     kroute.flags = 0;
     kroute.u.msi.address_lo = (uint32_t)msg.address;
     kroute.u.msi.address_hi = msg.address >> 32;
-    kroute.u.msi.data = msg.data;
+    kroute.u.msi.data = le32_to_cpu(msg.data);
 
     kvm_add_routing_entry(s, &kroute);
 
@@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, 
MSIMessage msg)
     kroute.flags = 0;
     kroute.u.msi.address_lo = (uint32_t)msg.address;
     kroute.u.msi.address_hi = msg.address >> 32;
-    kroute.u.msi.data = msg.data;
+    kroute.u.msi.data = le32_to_cpu(msg.data);
 
     return kvm_update_routing_entry(s, &kroute);
 }
-- 
1.7.10.4





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]