Re: [Qemu-devel] Incorrect handling of more PPC64 insns

[Peter Maydell]

On 7 May 2013 12:48, Torbjorn Granlund <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>   On 7 May 2013 11:27, Torbjorn Granlund <address@hidden> wrote:
>   > Alexander Graf <address@hidden> writes:
>   >   There's a certain chance that happens, yes. We don't have instruction
>   >   test suites for the PPC target.
>   >
>   > There certainly are more bugs.  GMP still crashes all over the place.
>
>   If you want to more seriously test the PPC instructions
>   it might be worth extending risu to cope with more than
>   just the ARM architecture...
>
> I am an involuntary tester of lots of software, and a voluntary tester
> of my own software.
>
> I think we should do testing of the software we write ourselves, since we
> else hurt the productivity of the community.
>
> I waste half my hacking time on other hackers' plain bugs.
>
> But no, I will not become a voluntary tester of the qemu hackers'
> untested code...

Sorry, I should have phrased myself more clearly. It was more
meant as a suggestion for anybody reading qemu-ppc/qemu-devel
who was interested.

-- PMM