qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: add block-backup QMP command


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: add block-backup QMP command
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:44:14 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.04.2013 um 09:42 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > @block-backup
> > 
> > Start a point-in-time copy of a block device to a new destination.  The
> > status of ongoing block backup operations can be checked with
> > query-block-jobs.  The operation can be stopped before it has completed 
> > using
> > the block-job-cancel command.
> > 
> > @device: the name of the device whose writes should be mirrored.
> > 
> > @target: the target of the new image. If the file exists, or if it
> >          is a device, the existing file/device will be used as the new
> >          destination.  If it does not exist, a new file will be created.
> > 
> > @format: #optional the format of the new destination, default is to
> >          probe if @mode is 'existing', else the format of the source
> > 
> > @mode: #optional whether and how QEMU should create a new image, default is
> >        'absolute-paths'.
> > 
> > @speed: #optional the maximum speed, in bytes per second
> > 
> > Returns: nothing on success
> >          If @device is not a valid block device, DeviceNotFound
> > 
> > Since 1.6
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> 
> drive-backup would probably be a more consistent naming. We would then
> still have block-backup for a future low-level command that doesn't
> create everything by itself but takes an existing BlockDriverState (e.g.
> created by blockdev-add).
> 
> We should also make it transactionable from the beginning, as we don't
> have schema introspection yet. This way we allow to assume that if the
> standalone command exists, the transaction subcommand exists as well.

Sounds good.  I'll make both changes.

Stefan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]