Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] xilinx_devcfg: Zynq devcfg device model

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 30/05/2013 09:15, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>>> >> Hi Peter, Should we be putting r->access->name here instead of 
>>> >> "devcfg-regs"?
>> >
>> > Yes, that's why I preferred to wrap the memory_region_init_io into an
>> > API that takes a RegisterInfo. :)
> ACK,
> 
> You've convinced me :). Will be in v4 (pending outcome of discussion
> with Anthony RE decoding)

I would also have preferred (I was too terse in mentioning
.accepts.valid earlier so this is the less concise explanation) an API
that does a single memory_region_init_io region for a whole array of
registers.  Basically having a RegisterArrayInfo in addition to the
RegisterInfo.

Paolo