qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V15 3/6] Create four QemuOptsList related functi


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V15 3/6] Create four QemuOptsList related functions
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:43:11 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6

On 05/30/2013 03:55 AM, Dongxu Wang wrote:
> From: Dong Xu Wang <address@hidden>
> 
> This patch will create 4 functions, count_opts_list, qemu_opts_append,

s/will create/creates/ - commit messages make the most sense when
written in present tense

> qemu_opts_free and qemu_opts_print_help, they will be used in following
> commits.
> 

Again, this portion...

> v12->v13:
> 1) simply assert that neither argument has merge_lists set.
> 2) drop superfluous paranthesesis around p == first.
> 
> v11->v12:
> 1) renmae functions.
> 2) fix loop styles and code styles.
> 3) qemu_opts_apend will not return NULL now.
> 4) merge_lists value is from arguments in qemu_opts_append.
> 
> v6->v7:
> 1) Fix typo.
> 
> v5->v6:
> 1) allocate enough space in append_opts_list function.

...belongs after '---', and

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dong Xu Wang <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Dongxu Wang <address@hidden>

your s-o-b is unusual.


> +
> +static size_t count_opts_list(QemuOptsList *list)
> +{
> +    size_t i = 0;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; list && list->desc[i].name; i++) {

No need to initialize i to 0 in two places.

> +        ;
> +    }
> +
> +    return i;
> +}
> +
> +/* Create a new QemuOptsList and make its desc to the merge of first
> + * and second. It will allocate space for one new QemuOptsList plus
> + * enough space for QemuOptDesc in first and second QemuOptsList.
> + * First argument's QemuOptDesc members take precedence over second's.
> + * The result's name and implied_opt_name are not copied from them.
> + * Both merge_lists should not be set. Both list can be NULL.
> + */
> +QemuOptsList *qemu_opts_append(QemuOptsList *first,
> +                               QemuOptsList *second)
> +{
> +    size_t num_first_opts, num_second_opts;
> +    QemuOptsList *dest = NULL;
> +    int i = 0;
> +    int index = 0;
> +    QemuOptsList *p = first;
> +
> +    num_first_opts = count_opts_list(first);
> +    num_second_opts = count_opts_list(second);
> +
> +    dest = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuOptsList)
> +        + (num_first_opts + num_second_opts + 1) * sizeof(QemuOptDesc));
> +
> +    dest->name = "append_opts_list";
> +    dest->implied_opt_name = NULL;
> +    assert((!first || !first->merge_lists)
> +        && (!second || !second->merge_lists));
> +    QTAILQ_INIT(&dest->head);
> +
> +    for (i = 0; p && p->desc[i].name; i++) {

Again, a double-initialization of i [1]

> +        if (!find_desc_by_name(dest->desc, p->desc[i].name)) {
> +            dest->desc[index].name = g_strdup(p->desc[i].name);
> +            dest->desc[index].help = g_strdup(p->desc[i].help);
> +            dest->desc[index].type = p->desc[i].type;
> +            dest->desc[index].def_value_str =
> +                g_strdup(p->desc[i].def_value_str);

Do we really have to strdup these elements, or are we guaranteed that
the scope of the original first/second list is always larger than the
scope of the merged list, and can thus share the existing pointer rather
than creating copies? [2]

> +            index++;
> +        }
> +        if (p == first && p && !p->desc[i].name) {
> +            p = second;
> +            i = 0;
> +        }
> +    }
> +    dest->desc[index].name = NULL;
> +    return dest;
> +}
> +
> +/* free a QemuOptsList, can accept NULL as arguments */
> +void qemu_opts_free(QemuOptsList *list)
> +{
> +    int i = 0;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; list && list->desc[i].name; i++) {

[1] and again for double initialization of i

> +        g_free((char *)list->desc[i].name);
> +        g_free((char *)list->desc[i].help);
> +        g_free((char *)list->desc[i].def_value_str);

[2] The fact that you have to cast away const is a sign that maybe you
shouldn't be storing strdup'd data in these pointers in the first place.

> +    }
> +
> +    g_free(list);
> +}
> +
> +void qemu_opts_print_help(QemuOptsList *list)
> +{
> +    int i = 0;
> +    printf("Supported options:\n");
> +    for (i = 0; list && list->desc[i].name; i++) {

[1] and another

> +        printf("%-16s %s\n", list->desc[i].name,
> +            list->desc[i].help ?
> +                list->desc[i].help : "No description available");
> +    }
> +}
> 

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]