qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vmdk: byteswap VMDK4Header.desc_offset field


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vmdk: byteswap VMDK4Header.desc_offset field
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:33:21 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:06:43AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 06/10 16:32, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:04:55PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 10.06.2013 um 11:07 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > > Remember to byteswap VMDK4Header.desc_offset on big-endian machines.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: address@hidden
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, applied to the block layer.
> > > 
> > > > @@ -507,8 +507,11 @@ static int vmdk_open_vmdk4(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > > >      if (ret < 0) {
> > > >          return ret;
> > > >      }
> > > > -    if (header.capacity == 0 && header.desc_offset) {
> > > > -        return vmdk_open_desc_file(bs, flags, header.desc_offset << 9);
> > > > +    if (header.capacity == 0) {
> > > > +        int64_t desc_offset = le64_to_cpu(header.desc_offset);
> > > > +        if (desc_offset) {
> > > > +            return vmdk_open_desc_file(bs, flags, desc_offset << 9);
> > > > +        }
> > > >      }
> > > 
> > > Splitting up the if condition wouldn't have been necessary, strictly
> > > speaking. But I don't mind too much here.
> > 
> > True.  The reason I did it is because accessing header.desc_offset
> > directly is a bad habit.  Someone modifying the code might conclude it's
> > safe to access directly when it actually only works for the limited
> > cases of zero and non-zero.
> > 
> 
> Not byteswapping header.capacity here, any reason?

Byteswapping header.capacity too is fine by me.  This patch is focussed
on just header.desc_offset.

Stefan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]