qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: move the bdrv_dev_change_media_cb


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: move the bdrv_dev_change_media_cb()
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:32:02 -0400

On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:25:24 +0200
Pavel Hrdina <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 17.6.2013 15:22, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:33:10 +0200
> > Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:46:19AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >>> On 5.6.2013 15:23, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:18:19PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >>>>> @@ -1071,14 +1072,18 @@ static void 
> >>>>> qmp_bdrv_open_encrypted(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *filename,
> >>>>>           if (password) {
> >>>>>               if (bdrv_set_key(bs, password) < 0) {
> >>>>>                   error_set(errp, QERR_INVALID_PASSWORD);
> >>>>> +                return;
> >>>>>               }
> >>>>>           } else {
> >>>>>               error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_ENCRYPTED, 
> >>>>> bdrv_get_device_name(bs),
> >>>>>                         bdrv_get_encrypted_filename(bs));
> >>>>> +            return;
> >>>>>           }
> >>>>>       } else if (password) {
> >>>>>           error_set(errp, QERR_DEVICE_NOT_ENCRYPTED, 
> >>>>> bdrv_get_device_name(bs));
> >>>>>       }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +    bdrv_dev_change_media_cb(bs, true);
> >>>>>   }
> >>>>
> >>>> Calling bdrv_dev_change_media_cb() after raising
> >>>> QERR_DEVICE_NOT_ENCRYPTED is intentional?  It might warrant a comment.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for my late answer.
> >>>
> >>> It's just a warning, that you used a password for a block device that
> >>> doesn't require it. The device is opened successfully and should be
> >>> handled correctly (call the bdrv_dev_change_media_cb() ).
> >>
> >> Yep, IMO it's worth a comment that this isn't an "error" just a
> >> "warning".
> >
> > Actually, you can't have such a warning in QMP. You either fail or you
> > succeed. We should just do what the current code does.
> >
> 
> This is the same logic as the old one. The device is loaded but the
> error is emitted.

That's a bug if the operation succeeded.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]