qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 07/11] iscsi: let bdrv_create conditionally ze


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 07/11] iscsi: let bdrv_create conditionally zero out the device
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:22:51 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6

Il 01/07/2013 23:36, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> 
> Am 01.07.2013 um 22:20 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>:
> 
>> Il 27/06/2013 15:11, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> if the device supports unmapping and unmapped blocks read as
>>> zero ensure that the whole device is unmapped and report
>>> .has_zero_init = 1 in this case to speed up qemu-img convert.
>>
>> This can still take several minutes.  Do you need any special timeout in
>> libiscsi?
> 
> Not as far as I know. The number of unmapped sectors is bound by 
> iscsilun->max_unmap.
> This is what the storage will handle in one request. For my storage its the 
> internal
> page size (15MB). Its very fast. Except for some broken storages I expect 
> that unmapping
> on a thin-provisioned target means deleting of pointers or something similar 
> not actually
> writing something to the disks. This it what the SANITIZE command does.

Ok, I remember someone reporting timeouts when doing a discard with
virtio-scsi.  But maybe the problem there was that Linux parallelized
the requests excessively after splitting them.

> Do you have evidence that it is really taking minutes somewhere?
> 
> I tested it with a fully allocated 1TB volume. In my case it was a question 
> of about 20 seconds.
> I think this was mainly due to the thousands of sync requests that had to be 
> sent.
> 
>> Perhaps we can have a new "discard_zeroes" field in bdrv_get_info, and
>> the unmap functionality can be moved up to qemu-img convert?
> 
> Is there any other storage protocol out there that could benefit from it?

Definitely LVM.  Perhaps in the future gluster too, though right now it
only supports discard on files, not block devices.

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]