qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/3 v2] qom: introduce post_init() function


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/3 v2] qom: introduce post_init() function
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:29:10 -0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:29:15AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:08:41 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > This will allow classes to specify a function to be called after all
> > instance_init() functions were called.
> > 
> > This will be used by DeviceState to call qdev_prop_set_globals() at the
> > right moment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  include/qom/object.h |  3 +++
> >  qom/object.c         | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/qom/object.h b/include/qom/object.h
> > index 23fc048..1a54f64 100644
> > --- a/include/qom/object.h
> > +++ b/include/qom/object.h
> > @@ -398,6 +398,8 @@ struct Object
> >   * @instance_init: This function is called to initialize an object.  The 
> > parent
> >   *   class will have already been initialized so the type is only 
> > responsible
> >   *   for initializing its own members.
> > + * @instance_post_init: This function is called to finish initialization of
> > + *   an object, after all instance_init functions were called.
> >   * @instance_finalize: This function is called during object destruction.  
> > This
> >   *   is called before the parent @instance_finalize function has been 
> > called.
> >   *   An object should only free the members that are unique to its type in 
> > this
> > @@ -433,6 +435,7 @@ struct TypeInfo
> [...]
> >  
> > +static void object_post_init_with_type(Object *obj, TypeImpl *ti)
> > +{
> > +    if (ti->instance_post_init) {
> > +        ti->instance_post_init(obj);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (type_has_parent(ti)) {
> > +        object_post_init_with_type(obj, type_get_parent(ti));
> > +    }
> Is there  a reason why post init called in opposite order than
> instance_init() ?

Because it seems more useful: if parent types want to initialize
something before subclasses, they can use instance_init(). If they want
to initialize something _after_ subclasses, then they can use
instance_post_init().

> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  void object_initialize_with_type(void *data, TypeImpl *type)
> >  {
> >      Object *obj = data;
> > @@ -313,6 +326,7 @@ void object_initialize_with_type(void *data, TypeImpl 
> > *type)
> >      object_ref(obj);
> >      QTAILQ_INIT(&obj->properties);
> >      object_init_with_type(obj, type);
> > +    object_post_init_with_type(obj, type);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void object_initialize(void *data, const char *typename)
> 

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]