qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] linux-user: Enable NPTL for OpenRISC


From: Jia Liu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] linux-user: Enable NPTL for OpenRISC
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:40:14 +0800

Hi Peter,

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> The OpenRISC kernel ignores CLONE_SETTLS in its copy_thread()
> implementation, so a cpu_set_tls() implementation is a no-op.
> cpu_clone_regs() was setting the syscall return value in the
> wrong register -- it is gpr[11], not gpr[2]. With these two
> things fixed, we can compile with NPTL enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
>  configure                        |    1 -
>  linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h |    9 +++++++--
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 4a241e0..3848c1c 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -4229,7 +4229,6 @@ case "$target_name" in
>    or32)
>      TARGET_ARCH=openrisc
>      TARGET_BASE_ARCH=openrisc
> -    target_nptl="no"
>    ;;

I noticed configure have no this line.

>    ppc)
>      gdb_xml_files="power-core.xml power-fpu.xml power-altivec.xml 
> power-spe.xml"
> diff --git a/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h 
> b/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> index 501fb81..32a46ac 100644
> --- a/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> +++ b/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> @@ -25,9 +25,14 @@ static inline void cpu_clone_regs(CPUOpenRISCState *env, 
> target_ulong newsp)
>      if (newsp) {
>          env->gpr[1] = newsp;
>      }
> -    env->gpr[2] = 0;
> +    env->gpr[11] = 0;
>  }
>
> -/* TODO: need to implement cpu_set_tls() */
> +static inline void cpu_set_tls(CPUOpenRISCState *env, target_ulong newtls)
> +{
> +    /* Linux kernel 3.10 does not pay any attention to CLONE_SETTLS
> +     * in copy_thread(), so QEMU need not do so either.
> +     */
> +}

Thanks for fix. It looks good to me.

I need to reply here a Reviewed-by: Jia Liu <address@hidden> , yes?

>
>  #endif
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

Regards,
Jia



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]