Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/2] Add Enhanced Three-Speed Ethernet Controller (eTSEC)

[Alexander Graf]

On 07/16/2013 05:28 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 04:06 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 07/10/2013 12:10:02 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> > > This implementation doesn't include ring priority, TCP/IP Off-Load, QoS.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau<address@hidden>
> >  From the code comments I gather this has been tested on VxWorks.  Has it
> > been tested on Linux, or anywhere else?
> You're right, as I said in the cover letter, this has only been tested on 
> vxWorks.

Could you please give it a try? IIRC eTSEC support should be in upstream 
Linux.

[...]

> > > +    /* ring_base = (etsec->regs[RBASEH].value&  0xF)<<  32; */
> > > +    ring_base     += etsec->regs[RBASE0 + ring_nbr].value&  ~0x7;
> > > +    start_bd_addr  = bd_addr = etsec->regs[RBPTR0 + ring_nbr].value&  ~0x7;
> > What about RBDBPH (upper bits of physical address)?  Likewise for TX.
> I'm only interested in 32bits address spaces, so RBASEH, TBASEH, RBDBPH or 
> TBDBPH.

Why? I thought e500mc and above can access more than 32bits of physical 
address space? Oh, but they're always DPAA?


Alex