qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv5 3/3] iscsi: add .bdrv_co_discard


From: Peter Lieven
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv5 3/3] iscsi: add .bdrv_co_discard
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:37:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 19.07.2013 11:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 19/07/2013 09:19, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <address@hidden>
---
  block/iscsi.c |  156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c
index 19afd6c..cb44fb1 100644
--- a/block/iscsi.c
+++ b/block/iscsi.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ typedef struct IscsiAIOCB {
  #define NOP_INTERVAL 5000
  #define MAX_NOP_FAILURES 3
  #define ISCSI_CMD_RETRIES 5
+#define ISCSI_MAX_UNMAP 131072
static void
  iscsi_bh_cb(void *p)
@@ -622,88 +623,6 @@ iscsi_aio_flush(BlockDriverState *bs,
      return &acb->common;
  }
-static int iscsi_aio_discard_acb(IscsiAIOCB *acb);
-
-static void
-iscsi_unmap_cb(struct iscsi_context *iscsi, int status,
-                     void *command_data, void *opaque)
-{
-    IscsiAIOCB *acb = opaque;
-
-    if (acb->canceled != 0) {
-        return;
-    }
-
-    acb->status = 0;
-    if (status != 0) {
-        if (status == SCSI_STATUS_CHECK_CONDITION
-            && acb->task->sense.key == SCSI_SENSE_UNIT_ATTENTION
-            && acb->retries-- > 0) {
-            scsi_free_scsi_task(acb->task);
-            acb->task = NULL;
-            if (iscsi_aio_discard_acb(acb) == 0) {
-                iscsi_set_events(acb->iscsilun);
-                return;
-            }
-        }
-        error_report("Failed to unmap data on iSCSI lun. %s",
-                     iscsi_get_error(iscsi));
-        acb->status = -EIO;
-    }
-
-    iscsi_schedule_bh(acb);
-}
-
-static int iscsi_aio_discard_acb(IscsiAIOCB *acb) {
-    struct iscsi_context *iscsi = acb->iscsilun->iscsi;
-    struct unmap_list list[1];
-
-    acb->canceled   = 0;
-    acb->bh         = NULL;
-    acb->status     = -EINPROGRESS;
-    acb->buf        = NULL;
-
-    list[0].lba = sector_qemu2lun(acb->sector_num, acb->iscsilun);
-    list[0].num = acb->nb_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE / 
acb->iscsilun->block_size;
-
-    acb->task = iscsi_unmap_task(iscsi, acb->iscsilun->lun,
-                                 0, 0, &list[0], 1,
-                                 iscsi_unmap_cb,
-                                 acb);
-    if (acb->task == NULL) {
-        error_report("iSCSI: Failed to send unmap command. %s",
-                     iscsi_get_error(iscsi));
-        return -1;
-    }
-
-    return 0;
-}
-
-static BlockDriverAIOCB *
-iscsi_aio_discard(BlockDriverState *bs,
-                  int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors,
-                  BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, void *opaque)
-{
-    IscsiLun *iscsilun = bs->opaque;
-    IscsiAIOCB *acb;
-
-    acb = qemu_aio_get(&iscsi_aiocb_info, bs, cb, opaque);
-
-    acb->iscsilun    = iscsilun;
-    acb->nb_sectors  = nb_sectors;
-    acb->sector_num  = sector_num;
-    acb->retries     = ISCSI_CMD_RETRIES;
-
-    if (iscsi_aio_discard_acb(acb) != 0) {
-        qemu_aio_release(acb);
-        return NULL;
-    }
-
-    iscsi_set_events(iscsilun);
-
-    return &acb->common;
-}
-
  #ifdef __linux__
  static void
  iscsi_aio_ioctl_cb(struct iscsi_context *iscsi, int status,
@@ -985,6 +904,77 @@ out:
      return ret;
  }
+static int
+coroutine_fn iscsi_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
+                                   int nb_sectors)
+{
+    IscsiLun *iscsilun = bs->opaque;
+    struct IscsiTask iTask;
+    struct unmap_list list;
+    uint32_t nb_blocks;
+    uint32_t max_unmap;
+
+    if (!is_request_lun_aligned(sector_num, nb_sectors, iscsilun)) {
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    if (!iscsilun->lbp.lbpu) {
+        /* UNMAP is not supported by the target */
+        return 0;
+    }
I guess you'll later add support for lbpws.
It depends: I think almost all targets will support both. I would use unmap for 
discard and write_same for write_zeroes.

Peter

Anyway, series looks fine.
Thanks. Feel free to pull it once the get_lba_status thing is upstream.

Peter



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]