qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: migrate vPMU state


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: migrate vPMU state
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:01:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Am 24.07.2013 16:37, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> This requires kernel 3.10 but it is otherwise quite simple to do.
> The kernel pays attention to MSRs writes that are host initiated, and
> disables all side effects of the PMU registers (e.g. the global status
> MSR can be written and global overflow control MSR does not clear bits
> in the global status MSR).
> 
> Only two bits are interesting.  First, the number of general-purpose
> counters must be fetched from CPUID so that we do not read non-existent
> MSRs.  It need not be part of the migration stream.
> 
> Second, to avoid any possible side effects during the setting of MSRs
> I stop the PMU while setting the counters and event selector MSRs.
> Stopping the PMU snapshots the counters and ensures that no strange
> races can happen if the counters were saved close to their overflow
> value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-i386/cpu.h     | 23 +++++++++++++
>  target-i386/kvm.c     | 93 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  target-i386/machine.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
> index 058c57f..522eed4 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
> @@ -304,6 +304,8 @@
>  #define MSR_TSC_ADJUST                  0x0000003b
>  #define MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE            0x6e0
>  
> +#define MSR_P6_PERFCTR0                      0xc1
> +
>  #define MSR_MTRRcap                  0xfe
>  #define MSR_MTRRcap_VCNT             8
>  #define MSR_MTRRcap_FIXRANGE_SUPPORT (1 << 8)
> @@ -317,6 +319,8 @@
>  #define MSR_MCG_STATUS                  0x17a
>  #define MSR_MCG_CTL                     0x17b
>  
> +#define MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0                      0x186
> +
>  #define MSR_IA32_PERF_STATUS            0x198
>  
>  #define MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE         0x1a0
> @@ -342,6 +346,14 @@
>  
>  #define MSR_MTRRdefType                      0x2ff
>  
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0     0x309
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR1     0x30a
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR2     0x30b
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL 0x38d
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS  0x38e
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL    0x38f
> +#define MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL        0x390
> +
>  #define MSR_MC0_CTL                  0x400
>  #define MSR_MC0_STATUS                       0x401
>  #define MSR_MC0_ADDR                 0x402
[snip]

We have a mix of lines with tab indentation and with space indentation
here - should new sections be using spaces to satisfy checkpatch.pl?

New msr_* fields would be candidates for X86CPU, but there's already one
in CPUX86State. :/

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]