qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] Cirrus VGA slow screen update, show blank s


From: Fabio Fantoni
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] Cirrus VGA slow screen update, show blank screen last 13s or so for windows XP guest
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:10:35 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Il 26/07/2013 03:57, Gonglei (Arei) ha scritto:


Il 25/07/2013 15:13, Gonglei (Arei) ha scritto:
Hi,
     I found a problem: For windows XP guest booting by qemu upstream,
using the RDP(Remote Desktop Protocol) and VNC protocol to connect the
windows XP guest
which booting by Qemu upstream respectively. the VNC client will become
blank screen last
13 seconds or so on XEN platform, and last 2 seconds on KVM. And through
debugging,
the cirrus VGA card does not produce dirty pages during the blank screen's
times.
     When -vga is changed from cirrus to std the issue goes away and the
update proceeds at normal speed.
In addition, when using the Qemu-dm replace Qemu upstream on XEN
platform,
the cirrus VGA works good and the issue goes away also.

     Today, lots of googling have seen the same behavior:

https://github.com/joyent/smartos-live/issues/215
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-06/msg02105.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574988
etc...

     But, I test the latest qemu-1.5.1, the problem exist firmly.

     Any ideas? Thanks!

Best Regards!
-Gonglei
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
I've seen the perfomance problem too with vnc when I started to try
upstream qemu. I already reported it on the end of 2011 but no solution yet.
I found spice as an alternative: qxl vga will not work on xen until SSE
support will be added on hvm domU, but spice is usable with stdvga and
performance is better that vnc. Combined with vdagent and usb
redirection it makes a perfect vkvm, and more.
Spice basic support in xl is already present and for more features I
posted some patches here but they are not included in upstream for now.
Cirrus vga drivers are also old and have limitations on both windows and
linux and they can add other problems, they are probably not good for
recent os/de.
Thanks for responding. I don't understand why the Qemu-dm works well
but the upstream qemu is not for the same windows XP guest image.
Does the Cirrus vga emulation have some differences between qemu-dm
and unstream qemu ?

-Gonglei
I did test on cirrus vga a long time ago, last was on videoram settings
patch.
Try to increase videoram setting to see if you see an increasing in
performances and/or the problem persists.
On my tests the performance seem identical.
I set the videoram 8M, because of the upstream qemu will crash if the videoram
less than 8M On the Xen prlatform, and the qemu's log show:

qemu: hardware error: xen: failed to populate ram at 7fc00000
CPU #0:
EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=00000633
ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=00000000
EIP=0000fff0 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
ES =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
CS =f000 ffff0000 0000ffff 00009b00
SS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
DS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
FS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
GS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
LDT=0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008200
TR =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008b00
GDT=     00000000 0000ffff
IDT=     00000000 0000ffff
CR0=60000010 CR2=00000000 CR3=00000000 CR4=00000000
DR0=00000000 DR1=00000000 DR2=00000000 DR3=0
0000000
etc...

This is because xen reserve ram for video specified by videoram parameter but upstream qemu forces to 8 mb in any case.
This should be fixed after this patch:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=2e814a017155b885e4d4b5a88dc05e7367a9722a
Is included on xen 4.3 and also backported to 4.2.2.

Probably the causes of video problems with upstream qemu are some
hardcoding on xen (probably on hvmloader and fixed seabios tables).
I wasn't able to found exactly problem.
Next, I will compare them.

-Gonglei





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]