qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] spapr-vscsi: add task management


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] spapr-vscsi: add task management
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:13:46 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6

On 07/29/2013 04:08 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/07/2013 06:49, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> At the moment the guest kernel issues two types of task management
>> requests to the hypervisor - task about and lun reset. This adds
>> handling for these tasks. As spapr-vscsi starts calling scsi_req_cancel(),
>> free_request callback was implemented.
>>
>> As virtio-vscsi, spapr-vscsi does not handle CLEAR_ACA either as CDB
>> control byte does not seem to be used at all so NACA bit is not
>> set to the guest so the guest has no good reason to call CLEAR_ACA task.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> Changes:
>> 2013/07/29 (v5):
>> * sending response on task management was fixed not to use vscsi_send_rsp()
>> as it is unable to send response data
>>
>> 2013/07/26:
>> * fixed error handling
>>
>> 2013/07/23:
>> * remove unnecessary free_request callback
>>
>> 2013/07/22:
>> * fixed LUN_RESET (it used to clear requests while it should reset a device)
>> * added handling of ABORT_TASK_SET/CLEAR_TASK_SET
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 117 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  hw/scsi/srp.h         |   7 +++
>>  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> index 541ffcc..8e49d0d 100644
>> --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
>> @@ -118,6 +118,20 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
>>      return NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s, uint64_t srp_tag)
>> +{
>> +    vscsi_req *req;
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
>> +        req = &s->reqs[i];
>> +        if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
>> +            return req;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void vscsi_put_req(vscsi_req *req)
>>  {
>>      if (req->sreq != NULL) {
>> @@ -654,40 +668,87 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req 
>> *req)
>>  static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
>>  {
>>      union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
>> -    int fn;
>> +    vscsi_req *tmpreq;
>> +    int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
>> +    SCSIDevice *d;
>> +    uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
>> +    uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
>>  
>>      fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
>>              iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
>>  
>> -    switch (iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func) {
>> -#if 0 /* We really don't deal with these for now */
>> -    case SRP_TSK_ABORT_TASK:
>> -        fn = ABORT_TASK;
>> -        break;
>> -    case SRP_TSK_ABORT_TASK_SET:
>> -        fn = ABORT_TASK_SET;
>> -        break;
>> -    case SRP_TSK_CLEAR_TASK_SET:
>> -        fn = CLEAR_TASK_SET;
>> -        break;
>> -    case SRP_TSK_LUN_RESET:
>> -        fn = LOGICAL_UNIT_RESET;
>> -        break;
>> -    case SRP_TSK_CLEAR_ACA:
>> -        fn = CLEAR_ACA;
>> -        break;
>> -#endif
>> -    default:
>> -        fn = 0;
>> -    }
>> -    if (fn) {
>> -        /* XXX Send/Handle target task management */
>> -        ;
>> +    d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun), 
>> &lun);
>> +    if (!d) {
>> +        resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
>>      } else {
>> -        vscsi_makeup_sense(s, req, ILLEGAL_REQUEST, 0x20, 0);
>> -        vscsi_send_rsp(s, req, CHECK_CONDITION, 0, 0);
>> +        switch (iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func) {
>> +        case SRP_TSK_ABORT_TASK:
>> +            if (d->lun != lun) {
>> +                resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
>> +                break;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
>> +            if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
>> +                assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
>> +                scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
>> +            }
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        case SRP_TSK_LUN_RESET:
>> +            if (d->lun != lun) {
>> +                resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
>> +                break;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            qdev_reset_all(&d->qdev);
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        case SRP_TSK_ABORT_TASK_SET:
>> +        case SRP_TSK_CLEAR_TASK_SET:
>> +            if (d->lun != lun) {
>> +                resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
>> +                break;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
>> +                tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
>> +                if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
>> +                    continue;
>> +                }
>> +                if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
>> +                    continue;
>> +                }
>> +                assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
>> +                scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
>> +            }
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        case SRP_TSK_CLEAR_ACA:
>> +            resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        default:
>> +            resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>>      }
>> -    return !fn;
>> +
>> +    /* Compose the response here as  */
>> +    memset(iu, 0, sizeof(struct srp_rsp) + 4);
>> +    iu->srp.rsp.opcode = SRP_RSP;
>> +    iu->srp.rsp.req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(1);
>> +    iu->srp.rsp.tag = tag;
>> +    iu->srp.rsp.flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_RSPVALID;
>> +    iu->srp.rsp.resp_data_len = cpu_to_be32(4);
>> +    /* Copy UCSOLNT bit as SRP_RSP_FLAG_RSPVALID is set */
>> +    iu->srp.rsp.sol_not = (sol_not & 0x04) >> 1;
> 
> This is ">> 2" and also needs to look at SCSOLNT with the same rules as
> normal responses, but I can fix this when applying.


Ouch, overlooked :( Thanks!



-- 
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]