qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] vl: Set current_machine early


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] vl: Set current_machine early
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:37:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8

Am 19.08.2013 11:35, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Am 16.08.2013 15:18, schrieb address@hidden:
>>> From: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> I'd like to access QEMUMachine from a QEMUMachine init() method, which
>>> is currently not possible.  Instead of passing it as an argument, I
>>> simply set current_machine earlier.
>>
>> We had such a patch for CPU hot-add and decided against doing this.
>> Currently current_machine != signals that it has been initialized. And
> 
> Does any code actually depend on this undocumented condition?  I found
> none.

I didn't audit. Currently the users are limited to vl.c itself,
device-hotplug.c for block_default_type and qmp.c for hot_add_cpu. pc.c
feels odd in that mix.

[...]
>> Can't you pass either QEMUMachine or the specific fields needed from PC
>> code to those SMBIOS functions? You did add a bool argument.
> 
> Can't see how to do that without passing the machine to QEMUMachine
> method init(), which involves touching all boards.  I doubt that's a
> good idea, but if you insist, I can do it.

Isn't that exactly what QEMUMachineArgs was meant to address? :)
Had a look at your don't-explode patches and they looked good.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]