qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/8] xics: add pre_save/post_load/cpu_setup d


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/8] xics: add pre_save/post_load/cpu_setup dispatchers
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:39:12 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 08/19/2013 11:54 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 19.08.2013 07:55, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>> The upcoming support of in-kernel XICS will redefine migration callbacks
>> for both ICS and ICP so classes and callback pointers are added.
>>
>> This adds a cpu_setup callback to the XICS device class (as XICS-KVM
>> will do it different) and xics_dispatch_cpu_setup(). This also moves
>> the place where xics_dispatch_cpu_setup() is called a bit further to
>> have VCPU initialized (required for XICS-KVM).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> Changes:
>> v3:
>> * fixed local variables names
>> ---
>>  hw/intc/xics.c        | 61 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c        |  4 ++--
>>  include/hw/ppc/xics.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/xics.c b/hw/intc/xics.c
>> index 6b3c071..e3a957d 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/xics.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/xics.c
> [...]
>> @@ -674,10 +724,12 @@ static Property xics_properties[] = {
>>  static void xics_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>  {
>>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>> +    XICSStateClass *k = XICS_CLASS(oc);
>>  
>>      dc->realize = xics_realize;
>>      dc->props = xics_properties;
>>      dc->reset = xics_reset;
>> +    k->cpu_setup = xics_cpu_setup;
>>  
>>      spapr_rtas_register("ibm,set-xive", rtas_set_xive);
>>      spapr_rtas_register("ibm,get-xive", rtas_get_xive);
> 
> This hunk is fixed up in 4/8, please squash that bit here.

Thanks for the review, fixed this.


> Otherwise looks good.

What exactly looks good? This patch only? The whole series? If it is the
whole series, can I put Reviewed-By: Andreas into them before repost them
all? I am asking because Alex Graf won't even look at them before I get
them reviewed/acked/signed by some one less ignorant than me :)
Thanks!



-- 
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]