[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] memory: allow MemoryRegion's priority f
From: |
Marcel Apfelbaum |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] memory: allow MemoryRegion's priority field to accept negative values |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:46:28 +0300 |
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 15:38 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 September 2013 15:13, Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Priority is used to make visible some subregions by obscuring
> > the parent MemoryRegion addresses overlapping with the subregion.
> >
> > By allowing the priority to be negative the opposite can be done:
> > Allow a subregion to be visible on all the addresses not covered
> > by the parent MemoryRegion or other subregions.
>
> This comment is not exactly accurate. Allowing priority to
> be signed is just a convenience: you can achieve exactly
> the same effect by specifying some positive priority for
> everything you map into the region and having the background
> region be priority zero. (If you care at all about priorities
> then everything being mapped into the region should be
> happening under the control of your code anyway.)
It seems (to me) that having the default priority 0 and
expanding on both directions depending on what you want to achieve
is an elegant solution. That being said, what you proposed would work too.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > include/exec/memory.h | 6 +++---
> > memory.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> > index ebe0d24..6995087 100644
> > --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> > +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ struct MemoryRegion {
> > bool flush_coalesced_mmio;
> > MemoryRegion *alias;
> > hwaddr alias_offset;
> > - unsigned priority;
> > + int priority;
> > bool may_overlap;
> > QTAILQ_HEAD(subregions, MemoryRegion) subregions;
> > QTAILQ_ENTRY(MemoryRegion) subregions_link;
> > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ struct MemoryListener {
> > void (*coalesced_mmio_del)(MemoryListener *listener,
> > MemoryRegionSection *section,
> > hwaddr addr, hwaddr len);
> > /* Lower = earlier (during add), later (during del) */
> > - unsigned priority;
> > + int priority;
>
> This is unrelated to MemoryRegion priorities -- it controls the
> order in which listener callbacks are called. Don't try to change
> both at once (and you only need the MR priorities anyway.)
I found that one :). I didn't updated the patches, thanks anyway
Marcel
>
> > AddressSpace *address_space_filter;
> > QTAILQ_ENTRY(MemoryListener) link;
> > };
> > @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ void memory_region_add_subregion(MemoryRegion *mr,
> > void memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(MemoryRegion *mr,
> > hwaddr offset,
> > MemoryRegion *subregion,
> > - unsigned priority);
> > + int priority);
> >
> > /**
> > * memory_region_get_ram_addr: Get the ram address associated with a memory
> > diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
> > index 886f838..dfb3ae6 100644
> > --- a/memory.c
> > +++ b/memory.c
> > @@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@ void memory_region_add_subregion(MemoryRegion *mr,
> > void memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(MemoryRegion *mr,
> > hwaddr offset,
> > MemoryRegion *subregion,
> > - unsigned priority)
> > + int priority)
> > {
> > subregion->may_overlap = true;
> > subregion->priority = priority;
>
> This isn't a complete set of changes. For instance
> memory_region_set_address() has a local variable 'priority'
> which should be signed now.
>
> sysbus_mmio_map_common() and sysbus_mmio_map_overlap()
> have priority arguments which need to change to match.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] pci: complete master abort protocol, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2013/09/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] hw/pci: add MemoryRegion ops for unassigned pci addresses, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2013/09/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] memory: allow MemoryRegion's priority field to accept negative values, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2013/09/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Peter Maydell, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Andreas Färber, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Peter Maydell, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Peter Maydell, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] hw/pci-host: catch acesses to unassigned pci addresses, Peter Maydell, 2013/09/02