qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - ipi


From: Jason J. Herne
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - ipi_states enhancements
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:19:46 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 09/05/2013 08:01 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 01.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Jason J. Herne:
From: "Jason J. Herne" <address@hidden>

...

This is what got us into the link<> discussion last time. If we do

for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ipi_states); i++) {
     name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
     object_property_add_link(qdev_get_machine(), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
                              &ipi_states[i], &err);
}

then we get said /machine/cpu[n] link<> properties, at a QMP level
either returning nothing or the canonical path to the CPU object.

On IRC I didn't get an answer of whether it was being done the above way
because there is infrastructure missing, and a look at object.h now
confirms that suspicion. CC'ing Anthony and Paolo.

Since object_property_add_link() uses a NULL opaque, my idea would be to
add a single setter hook argument passed through as opaque to
object_set_link_property(), which would call it with the old and the new
value.

The purpose would be to avoid growing our own internal setter API, which
is disjoint from the QMP qom-set we are targetting at.

I wrote the code, very close to how you suggested and it appears to be working when tested with qom-list. I'm still not certain why we need the ability to set the opaque of object_set_link_property()?

For reference here is what I did:

void s390_init_cpus(const char *cpu_model)
{
    int i;
    char* name;

    if (cpu_model == NULL) {
        cpu_model = "host";
    }

    ipi_states = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390CPU *) * max_cpus);

    for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
        name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
        object_property_add_link(qdev_get_machine(), name, TYPE_S390_CPU,
                                 (Object **)&ipi_states[i], NULL);
    }

    for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
        cpu_s390x_init(cpu_model);
    }
}

Yep, I know cpu_model is going away ;).

--
-- Jason J. Herne (address@hidden)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]