Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] We are now in soft freeze for 1.6

[Peter Maydell]

On 21 July 2013 13:52, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>> I'm pretty sure the latter is right (you only need code
>> posted, not committed) -- can we fix whichever of the two
>> pages is wrong, please?
>
> It depends on the definition of "major".  Any *feature* should have
> patches posted by soft freeze.  I guess a tiny feature would be an
> exception.
>
> For major features (things that have a high likelihood of breaking
> things), the feature should have started getting merged already.

I've updated the wiki pages
http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/SoftFeatureFreeze
http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.7

based on this. If anybody thinks I've mangled the consensus,
let me know and I'll fix.

thanks
-- PMM