Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] acpi-test: basic acpi unit-test

[Andreas Färber]

Am 17.10.2013 23:52, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> diff --git a/tests/acpi-test.c b/tests/acpi-test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..42de248
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/acpi-test.c
[...]
> +static void test_acpi_one(const char *params)
> +{
> +    char *args;
> +    uint8_t signature_low;
> +    uint8_t signature_high;
> +    uint16_t signature;
> +    int i;
> +    uint32_t off;
> +
> +
> +    args = g_strdup_printf("-net none -display none %s %s",
> +                           params ? params : "", disk);
> +    qtest_start(args);
> +
> +   /* Wait at most 1 minute */
> +#define TEST_DELAY (1 * G_USEC_PER_SEC / 10)
> +#define TEST_CYCLES (60 * G_USEC_PER_SEC / TEST_DELAY)
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < TEST_CYCLES; ++i) {
> +        signature_low = readb(BOOT_SECTOR_ADDRESS + SIGNATURE_OFFSET);
> +        signature_high = readb(BOOT_SECTOR_ADDRESS + SIGNATURE_OFFSET + 1);
> +        signature = (signature_high << 8) | signature_low;
> +        if (signature == SIGNATURE) {
> +            break;
> +        }
> +        g_usleep(TEST_DELAY);
> +    }
> +    g_assert_cmphex(signature, ==, SIGNATURE);

Might be a good safety precaution to use QEMU_BUG_ON() or MIN(..., 1)
for TEST_CYCLES to assure signature gets initialized before comparison.

> +
> +    /* OK, now find RSDP */
> +    for (off = 0xf0000; off < 0x100000; off += 0x10)
> +    {
> +        uint8_t sig[] = "RSD PTR ";
> +        int i;
> +
> +        for (i = 0; i < sizeof sig - 1; ++i) {
> +            sig[i] = readb(off + i);
> +        }
> +
> +        if (!memcmp(sig, "RSD PTR ", sizeof sig)) {
> +            break;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    g_assert_cmphex(off, <, 0x100000);
> +
> +    qtest_quit(global_qtest);
> +    g_free(args);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_acpi_tcg(void)
> +{
> +    test_acpi_one("-machine accel=tcg");
> +}
> +
> +static void test_acpi_kvm(void)
> +{
> +    test_acpi_one("-enable-kvm -machine accel=kvm");
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +    const char *arch = qtest_get_arch();
> +    FILE *f = fopen(disk, "w");
> +    fwrite(boot_sector, 1, sizeof boot_sector, f);
> +    fclose(f);
> +
> +    g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> +
> +    if (strcmp(arch, "i386") == 0 || strcmp(arch, "x86_64") == 0) {
> +        qtest_add_func("acpi/tcg", test_acpi_tcg);
> +        qtest_add_func("acpi/kvm", test_acpi_kvm);

Sorry, while the intention is good, this is a no-go. Not only will make
check fail on KVM-incompatible x86 hosts (including insufficient
permissions for /dev/kvm), it will also fail on ppc or arm hosts since
we are testing the target architecture here.

Regards,
Andreas

> +    }
> +    return g_test_run();
> +}
[snip]

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg