qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH repost] ahci: fix win7 hang on boot


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH repost] ahci: fix win7 hang on boot
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:14 +0200

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:32:12PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/10/2013 20:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > From: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> > 
> > When AHCI executes an asynchronous IDE command, it checked DRDY without
> > checking either DRQ or BSY.  This sometimes caused interrupt to be sent
> > before command is actually completed.
> > 
> > This resulted in a race condition: if guest then managed to access the
> > device before command has completed, it would hang waiting for an
> > interrupt.
> > This was observed with windows 7 guests.
> > 
> > To fix, check for DRQ or BSY in additiona to DRDY, if set,
> > the command is asynchronous so delay the interrupt until
> > asynchronous done callback is invoked.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > Tested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > 
> > ---
> >  hw/ide/ahci.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.c b/hw/ide/ahci.c
> > index a8be62c..fbea9e8 100644
> > --- a/hw/ide/ahci.c
> > +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.c
> > @@ -961,7 +961,8 @@ static int handle_cmd(AHCIState *s, int port, int slot)
> >          /* We're ready to process the command in FIS byte 2. */
> >          ide_exec_cmd(&s->dev[port].port, cmd_fis[2]);
> >  
> > -        if (s->dev[port].port.ifs[0].status & READY_STAT) {
> > +        if ((s->dev[port].port.ifs[0].status & 
> > (READY_STAT|DRQ_STAT|BUSY_STAT)) ==
> > +            READY_STAT) {
> >              ahci_write_fis_d2h(&s->dev[port], cmd_fis);
> >          }
> >      }
> > 
> 
> While the patch fixes the symptom, I think it is only a bandaid.
> 
> There is no reason why the async_cmd_done should be restricted to
> asynchronous commands.  If synchronous commands are made to go through
> the async_cmd_done callback, you'll automatically get the D2H FIS
> written for all commands.

I suggested this to Kevin offline but he prefers it like this.

> It's good for 1.7, but let's revisit it for 1.8.
> 
> Paolo

Fine with me.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]