qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] qapi script: check correctness of discrimin


From: Wenchao Xia
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] qapi script: check correctness of discriminator values in union
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:30:30 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

于 2013/11/13 2:12, Eric Blake 写道:
On 11/06/2013 12:33 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
It will check whether the values specified are written correctly when
discriminator is a pre-defined enum type, which help check whether the
schema is in good form.

It is allowed, that not every value in enum is used, so does not check
that case.

Again, I think you should require that every value in the enum is used.


Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
---
  scripts/qapi-visit.py |   11 +++++++++++
  scripts/qapi.py       |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
index b3d3af8..612dc4d 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
@@ -251,6 +251,17 @@ def generate_visit_union(expr):
          assert not base
          return generate_visit_anon_union(name, members)

+    # If discriminator is specified and it is a pre-defined enum in schema,
+    # check its correctness
+    enum_define = discriminator_find_enum_define(expr)
+    if enum_define:
+        for key in members:
+            if not key in enum_define["enum_values"]:
+                sys.stderr.write("Discriminator value '%s' not found in "
+                                 "enum '%s'\n" %
+                                 (key, enum_define["enum_name"]))
+                sys.exit(1)

This checks for union branches not covered by the enum, but does not
check for duplicate union branches, nor does it check for enum values
not covered by a union branch.

  I agree that, allowing enum values not covered by union branch,
require more carefully error handling for caller, such as visitors,
will add the check for safty reason.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]