qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/60] AArch64: Add orr instruction emulation


From: Claudio Fontana
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/60] AArch64: Add orr instruction emulation
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:15:09 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Thunderbird/15.0.1

Hello,

On 09/27/2013 08:25 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 05:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> This patch adds emulation support for the orr instruction.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target-arm/helper-a64.c    |  28 +++++++++++
>>  target-arm/helper-a64.h    |   1 +
>>  target-arm/translate-a64.c | 120 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
>> index 8105fb5..da72b7f 100644
>> --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c
>> +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
>> @@ -24,3 +24,31 @@
>>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>  #include "qemu/bitops.h"
>>  
>> +uint32_t HELPER(pstate_add)(uint32_t pstate, uint64_t a1, uint64_t a2,
>> +                            uint64_t ar)
>> +{
>> +    int64_t s1 = a1;
>> +    int64_t s2 = a2;
>> +    int64_t sr = ar;
>> +
>> +    pstate &= ~(PSTATE_N | PSTATE_Z | PSTATE_C | PSTATE_V);
>> +
>> +    if (sr < 0) {
>> +        pstate |= PSTATE_N;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!ar) {
>> +        pstate |= PSTATE_Z;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (ar && (ar < a1)) {
>> +        pstate |= PSTATE_C;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ((s1 > 0 && s2 > 0 && sr < 0) ||
>> +        (s1 < 0 && s2 < 0 && sr > 0)) {
>> +        pstate |= PSTATE_V;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return pstate;
>> +}
> 
> Why are you not using the same split apart bits as A32?
> 
>> +    /* XXX carry_out */
>> +    switch (shift_type) {
> 
> What carry out?  I see no such in the ShiftReg description.
> 
>> +    case 3:
>> +        tcg_gen_rotr_i64(r, cpu_reg(reg), tcg_shift);
>> +        break;
> 
> Incorrect rotate for 32bit?
> 
>> +static void handle_orr(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
>> +{
>> +    int is_32bit = !get_bits(insn, 31, 1);
>> +    int dest = get_reg(insn);
>> +    int source = get_bits(insn, 5, 5);
>> +    int rm = get_bits(insn, 16, 5);
>> +    int shift_amount = get_sbits(insn, 10, 6);
>> +    int is_n = get_bits(insn, 21, 1);
>> +    int shift_type = get_bits(insn, 22, 2);
>> +    int opc = get_bits(insn, 29, 2);
>> +    bool setflags = (opc == 0x3);
>> +    TCGv_i64 tcg_op2;
>> +    TCGv_i64 tcg_dest;
>> +
>> +    if (is_32bit && (shift_amount < 0)) {
>> +        /* reserved value */
>> +        unallocated_encoding(s);
>> +    }
> 
> Why are you extracting shift_amount signed?
> 
>> +
>> +    /* MOV is dest = xzr & (source & ~0) */
> 
> Comment is wrong.
> 
>> +    if (!shift_amount && source == 0x1f) {

Besides the comment, is this correct?
I am trying to rework this patch, but this part seems incorrect to me.

We land here for the AND as well, and if source(rn) is xzr,
then I would expect the result to be zero for AND regardless of anything else,
and not a MOV.

Can we really do this optimization in general here for AND, OR, EOR?

Thanks for any clarification,

Claudio

>> +        if (is_32bit) {
>> +            tcg_gen_ext32u_i64(cpu_reg_sp(dest), cpu_reg(rm));
>> +        } else {
>> +            tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_reg_sp(dest), cpu_reg(rm));
>> +        }
>> +        if (is_n) {
>> +            tcg_gen_not_i64(cpu_reg_sp(dest), cpu_reg_sp(dest));
>> +        }
>> +        if (is_32bit) {
>> +            tcg_gen_ext32u_i64(cpu_reg_sp(dest), cpu_reg_sp(dest));
>> +        }
> 
> These are incorrect -- no sp in the logical ops, but xzr instead.
> 
> And surely we can emit fewer opcodes for the simple cases here.
> Since these are the canonical aliases for mov/mvn, it'll pay off.
> 
>     TCGv src = cpu_reg(rm);
>     TCGv dst = cpu_reg(rd);
> 
>     if (is_n) {
>         tcg_gen_not_i64(dst, src);
>         src = dst;
>     }
>     if (is_32bit) {
>         tcg_gen_ext32u_i64(dst, src);
>     } else {
>         tcg_gen_mov_i64(dst, src);
>     }
> 
> Note that tcg_gen_mov_i64 does the src == dst check, so a simple
> 64-bit mvn will only emit the not.
> 
> 
>> +    tcg_dest = cpu_reg(dest);
>> +    switch (opc) {
>> +    case 0x0:
>> +    case 0x3:
>> +        tcg_gen_and_i64(tcg_dest, cpu_reg(source), tcg_op2);
>> +        break;
>> +    case 0x1:
>> +        tcg_gen_or_i64(tcg_dest, cpu_reg(source), tcg_op2);
>> +        break;
>> +    case 0x2:
>> +        tcg_gen_xor_i64(tcg_dest, cpu_reg(source), tcg_op2);
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (is_32bit) {
>> +        tcg_gen_ext32u_i64(tcg_dest, tcg_dest);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (setflags) {
>> +        gen_helper_pstate_add(pstate, pstate, tcg_dest, cpu_reg(31), 
>> tcg_dest);
>> +    }
> 
> Incorrect flags generated.  They're different between add/sub and logical.
> In particular, C and V are always zero.
> 
>> +        handle_orr(s, insn);
> 
> And please use a more proper name than ORR for something that handles all
> of the logical insns.
> 
> 
> r~
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]