[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [for-1.7] hw/i386/acpi-build.c vs glib-2.12
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [for-1.7] hw/i386/acpi-build.c vs glib-2.12 |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:49:40 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
hw/i386/acpi-build.c:294:5: error: implicit declaration of function
‘g_string_vprintf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
g_string_vprintf(s, format, args);
Introduced in 2.14.
hw/i386/acpi-build.c:427:5: error: implicit declaration of function
‘g_array_get_element_size’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return table->len * g_array_get_element_size(table);
Introduced in 2.22.
Our (self-)documented minimums are
if test "$mingw32" = yes; then
# g_poll is required in order to integrate with the glib main loop.
glib_req_ver=2.20
else
glib_req_ver=2.12
fi
Within unix variants at least, vs(n)printf is likely to be much more portable
than the glib function. I suspect MinGW has it as well, though I've not
checked.
As for g_array_get_element_size, aren't all of your tables element size 1?
That's all I can see from acpi_build_tables_init, though I admit to not digging
deeper.
r~
- [Qemu-devel] [for-1.7] hw/i386/acpi-build.c vs glib-2.12,
Richard Henderson <=