qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't crash on keyboard input with no handler


From: Don Koch
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't crash on keyboard input with no handler
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:33:30 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8

On 11/19/2013 02:17 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 19.11.2013 19:26, schrieb Don Koch:
>> Prevent a call to put_kbd if null.
>>
>> On shutdown of some OSes, the keyboard handler goes away before the
>> system is down. If a key is typed during this window, qemu crashes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Don Koch <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> I left the printf call, originally for testing, but useful as a sanity
>> check if the user wonders why his keyboard input was ignored. AFAIC,
>> it can be removed.
> 
> I'd remove that printf and combine the two if statements in the final patch.

Works for me (if nobody thinks otherwise).

>>
>> PS: Anthony, your address in the MAINTAINER file is still at ibm.
>> I assume that is no longer correct, yes?
> 
> The address is correct in the latest git version.

Count on me to be in the wrong branch when I checked that.

>>
>>  ui/input.c | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ui/input.c b/ui/input.c
>> index 92c44ca..28ef6a6 100644
>> --- a/ui/input.c
>> +++ b/ui/input.c
>> @@ -415,8 +415,10 @@ void kbd_put_keycode(int keycode)
>>          return;
>>      }
>>      if (entry) {
>> -        entry->put_kbd(entry->opaque, keycode);
>> +        if (entry->put_kbd)
>> +            entry->put_kbd(entry->opaque, keycode);
>> +        else
>> +            printf("%s: no keyboard handler\n", __FUNCTION__);
>>      }
>>  }
>>
> 
> 
> Please check the coding style with scripts/checkpatch.pl.

Of course, I remembered to do this afterwards. Turns out, the only
problems will go away if I drop the printf. I meant to send a follow-up
stating that and that I would wait to see what the consensus was on
the printf before applying the appropriate changes (thunderbird had
other ideas :-( ).

> 
> Regards,
> Stefan Weil

Thanks,
-d





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]