[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Query KVM for available memory slots
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Query KVM for available memory slots |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:16:09 +0100 |
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:12:44 -0700
Alex Williamson <address@hidden> wrote:
> KVM reports the number of available memory slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS)
> using the extension interface. Both x86 and s390 implement this, ARM
> and powerpc do not yet enable it. Convert the static slots array to
> be dynamically allocated, supporting more slots when available.
> Default to 32 when KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS is not implemented. The
> motivation for this change is to support more assigned devices, where
> memory mapped PCI MMIO BARs typically take one slot each.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> ---
> kvm-all.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index 4478969..63c4e9b 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ typedef struct kvm_dirty_log KVMDirtyLog;
>
> struct KVMState
> {
> - KVMSlot slots[32];
> + KVMSlot *slots;
> + int nr_slots;
> int fd;
> int vmfd;
> int coalesced_mmio;
> @@ -125,7 +126,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_alloc_slot(KVMState *s)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
> if (s->slots[i].memory_size == 0) {
> return &s->slots[i];
> }
> @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_matching_slot(KVMState *s,
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>
> if (start_addr == mem->start_addr &&
> @@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(KVMState *s,
> KVMSlot *found = NULL;
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>
> if (mem->memory_size == 0 ||
> @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void
> *ram,
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>
> if (ram >= mem->ram && ram < mem->ram + mem->memory_size) {
> @@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ static int kvm_set_migration_log(int enable)
>
> s->migration_log = enable;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
> mem = &s->slots[i];
>
> if (!mem->memory_size) {
> @@ -1383,9 +1384,6 @@ int kvm_init(void)
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
> QTAILQ_INIT(&s->kvm_sw_breakpoints);
> #endif
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
> - s->slots[i].slot = i;
> - }
> s->vmfd = -1;
> s->fd = qemu_open("/dev/kvm", O_RDWR);
> if (s->fd == -1) {
> @@ -1409,6 +1407,19 @@ int kvm_init(void)
> goto err;
> }
>
> + s->nr_slots = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
> +
> + /* If unspecified, use the previous default value */
I'd remove the "previous" in the comment here, because if you look at
this code in a couple of years, nobody will remember what "previous" is
refering to here.
> + if (!s->nr_slots) {
> + s->nr_slots = 32;
> + }
> +
> + s->slots = g_malloc0(s->nr_slots * sizeof(KVMSlot));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
> + s->slots[i].slot = i;
> + }
> +
> /* check the vcpu limits */
> soft_vcpus_limit = kvm_recommended_vcpus(s);
> hard_vcpus_limit = kvm_max_vcpus(s);
> @@ -1527,6 +1538,7 @@ err:
> if (s->fd != -1) {
> close(s->fd);
> }
> + g_free(s->slots);
> g_free(s);
>
> return ret;
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>