qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU dies on any attempt to load a Linux kernel module


From: Richard Yao
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU dies on any attempt to load a Linux kernel module when using a 9P rootfs
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:47:32 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130925 Thunderbird/17.0.9

I have this bad habit of not reviewing emails until after I send them.
Anyway, Chris, thanks for your offer of help, but I can handle this on
my own. The previous email was mostly to give you an early version of
the patch and let you know what I plan to do to improve upon it before I
propose some version of this patch to the appropriate subsystem
maintainer(s).

On 11/26/2013 10:38 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
> Christopher,
> 
> It sounds like you disabled zero-copy entirely, which is not necessary.
> As far as I recall, loading kernel modules is the only case in which
> valloc() allocated buffers are used. In the worst case, we only need to
> disable zero-copy on such buffers. I have been using a small patch to do
> precisely that since yesterday. I have attached it to this email since
> it sounds like the first version might be helpful to others while I take
> the time to explore a few loose ends.
> 
> That being said, I would like to investigate a couple of things before I
> send either this patch or some variant of it to the appropriate
> subsystem maintainer. First, I need to review the valloc() routines to
> ensure that range checking against [VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END) is the
> correct way to identify valloc() generated buffers. Second, I want to
> explore the feasibility of a suggestion by Alexander Graf to instead
> rework the zero-copy to properly handle valloc() allocated buffers.
> Yours truly,
> Richard Yao
> 
> On 11/26/2013 10:16 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 11/25/2013 04:50 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>>> I figured out the problem. There is zerocopy IO is being done via DMA to
>>> a buffer allocated with valloc(). Right now, I am running a hack-fix
>>> locally so I can get some other stuff done first. I will propose a
>>> proper fix to the list in a few days.
>>
>> I've also encountered this issue on a non-QEMU simulator and have been
>> carrying a disable-zero-copy hack for a few months. Let me know if there's
>> anything I can help with.
>>
>> Christopher
>>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]