qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH arm-devs v2 1/2] hw/timer: Introduce ARM A9 Glob


From: Peter Crosthwaite
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH arm-devs v2 1/2] hw/timer: Introduce ARM A9 Global Timer.
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:55:59 +1000

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Peter Maydell
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 15 July 2013 06:19,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>>
>> The ARM A9 MPCore has a timer that is global to all CPUs in the mpcore.
>> The timer is shared but each CPU has a private independent comparator
>> and interrupt.
>>
>> Based on version contributed by Francois LEGAL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: François LEGAL <address@hidden>
>> [PC changes:
>>  * New commit message
>>  * Re-implemented as single timer model
>>  * Fixed backwards counting issue in polled mode
>>  * completed VMSD fields
>>  * macroified magic numbers (and headerified reg definitions)
>>  * split of as device-model-only patch
>>  * use bitops for 64 bit register access
>>  * Fixed auto increment mode to check condition properly
>>  * general cleanup (names etc).
>> ]
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> Changed since v1:
>> Added /*< private >*/ to struct definition.
>> Pulled register definitions out into a header (AF review)
>> SOB Francois LEGAL with PC changes indicated.
>>
>>  hw/timer/Makefile.objs      |   2 +-
>>  hw/timer/a9gtimer.c         | 412 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/hw/timer/a9gtimer.h |  33 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 446 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 hw/timer/a9gtimer.c
>>  create mode 100644 include/hw/timer/a9gtimer.h
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/timer/Makefile.objs b/hw/timer/Makefile.objs
>> index eca5905..42d96df 100644
>> --- a/hw/timer/Makefile.objs
>> +++ b/hw/timer/Makefile.objs
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  common-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TIMER) += arm_timer.o
>> -common-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MPTIMER) += arm_mptimer.o
>> +common-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MPTIMER) += arm_mptimer.o a9gtimer.o
>
> As I understand it, a new device should have its own
> CONFIG_WHATEVER switch set in default-configs/arm-softmmu.mak;
> we shouldn't share them. (The eventual idea is that you might
> want to disable some boards, in which case a config with
> only 11mpcore boards and no a9 boards would want the
> arm_mptimer but not the a9gtimer compiled.)
>
>>  common-obj-$(CONFIG_CADENCE) += cadence_ttc.o
>>  common-obj-$(CONFIG_DS1338) += ds1338.o
>>  common-obj-$(CONFIG_HPET) += hpet.o
>> diff --git a/hw/timer/a9gtimer.c b/hw/timer/a9gtimer.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..72ebeba
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/timer/a9gtimer.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Global peripheral timer block for ARM A9MP
>> + *
>> + * (C) 2013 Xilinx Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Written by François LEGAL
>> + * Written by Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
>> + * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
>> + * with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> +#include "qemu/timer.h"
>> +#include "qemu/bitops.h"
>> +#include "qemu/log.h"
>> +
>> +#include "hw/timer/a9gtimer.h"
>> +
>> +#ifndef ARM_GTIMER_ERR_DEBUG
>> +#define ARM_GTIMER_ERR_DEBUG 0
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#define DB_PRINT_L(level, ...) do { \
>> +    if (ARM_GTIMER_ERR_DEBUG > (level)) { \
>> +        fprintf(stderr,  ": %s: ", __func__); \
>> +        fprintf(stderr, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
>> +    } \
>> +} while (0);
>> +
>> +#define DB_PRINT(...) DB_PRINT_L(0, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>> +
>> +#define MAX_CPUS 4
>> +
>> +typedef struct A9GlobalTimerPerCPU A9GlobalTimerPerCPU;
>> +typedef struct A9GlobalTimerState A9GlobalTimerState;
>> +
>> +struct A9GlobalTimerPerCPU {
>> +    A9GlobalTimerState *parent;
>> +
>> +    uint32_t control; /* only per cpu banked bits valid */
>> +    uint64_t compare;
>> +    uint32_t status;
>> +    uint32_t inc;
>> +
>> +    MemoryRegion iomem;
>> +    qemu_irq irq; /* PPI interrupts */
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct A9GlobalTimerState {
>> +    /*< private >*/
>> +    SysBusDevice parent_obj;
>> +    /*< public >*/
>> +
>> +    MemoryRegion iomem;
>> +    /* static props */
>> +    uint32_t num_cpu;
>> +
>> +    QEMUTimer *timer;
>> +
>> +    uint64_t counter; /* current timer value */
>> +
>> +    uint64_t ref_counter;
>> +    uint64_t cpu_ref_time; /* the cpu time as of last update of ref_counter 
>> */
>
> Is it really correct that we migrate one of these fields
> but not the other,

Migrated ref_counter. Thanks.

> and don't clear either on reset?
>

These don't matter on reset as they are only used for differential
time calculation for a running timer. They are guest invisible. Reset
de-activates the timer which implictly invalidates them. They can only
be set again by starting a stopped timer which refreshes them.

>> +    uint32_t control; /* only non per cpu banked bits valid */
>> +
>> +    A9GlobalTimerPerCPU per_cpu[MAX_CPUS];
>> +};
>> +
>> +typedef struct A9GTimerUpdate {
>> +    uint64_t now;
>> +    uint64_t new;
>> +} A9GTimerUpdate;
>> +
>> +static inline int a9_gtimer_get_current_cpu(A9GlobalTimerState *s)
>> +{
>> +    if (current_cpu->cpu_index >= s->num_cpu) {
>> +        hw_error("arm_mptimer: num-cpu %d but this cpu is %d!\n",
>> +                 s->num_cpu, current_cpu->cpu_index);
>> +    }
>> +    return current_cpu->cpu_index;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint64_t a9_gtimer_get_conv(A9GlobalTimerState *s)
>> +{
>> +    uint64_t prescale = extract32(s->control, R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT,
>> +                                  R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_LEN);
>> +
>> +    return (prescale + 1) * 100;
>
> Why do we use * 100 here, but only * 10 in the arm_mptimer
> scaling function?
>

Changed to * 10 for consistency.

>> +}
>> +
>> +static A9GTimerUpdate a9_gtimer_get_update(A9GlobalTimerState *s)
>> +{
>> +    A9GTimerUpdate ret;
>> +
>> +    ret.now = qemu_get_clock_ns(vm_clock);
>> +    ret.new = s->ref_counter +
>> +              (ret.now - s->cpu_ref_time) / a9_gtimer_get_conv(s);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void a9_gtimer_update(A9GlobalTimerState *s, bool sync)
>> +{
>> +
>> +    A9GTimerUpdate update = a9_gtimer_get_update(s);
>> +    int i;
>> +    int64_t next_cdiff = 0;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; ++i) {
>> +        A9GlobalTimerPerCPU *gtb = &s->per_cpu[i];
>> +        int64_t cdiff = 0;
>> +
>> +        if ((s->control & R_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE) &&
>> +                (gtb->control & R_CONTROL_COMP_ENABLE)) {
>> +            /* R2p0+, where the compare function is > */
>
> The TRM says it's "greater than or equal to". I think
> your code is correct, but this comment is wrong.
>

Fixed.

>> +            while (gtb->compare < update.new) {
>> +                DB_PRINT("Compare event happened for CPU %d\n", i);
>> +                gtb->status = 1;
>> +                if (gtb->control & R_CONTROL_AUTO_INCREMENT) {
>> +                    DB_PRINT("Auto incrementing timer compare by %" PRId32 
>> "\n",
>> +                             gtb->inc);
>> +                    gtb->compare += gtb->inc;
>> +                } else {
>> +                    break;
>> +                }
>> +            }
>> +            cdiff = (int64_t)gtb->compare - (int64_t)update.new + 1;
>
> It looks odd that we're doing our "time to next comparison" in
> signed arithmetic, but our "have we fired yet?" check above is
> doing an unsigned comparison.
>
>> +            if (cdiff > 0 && (cdiff < next_cdiff || !next_cdiff)) {
>> +                next_cdiff = cdiff;
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        qemu_set_irq(gtb->irq,
>> +                     gtb->status && (gtb->control & R_CONTROL_IRQ_ENABLE));
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    qemu_del_timer(s->timer);
>> +    if (next_cdiff) {
>> +        DB_PRINT("scheduling qemu_timer to fire again in %"
>> +                 PRIx64 " cycles\n", next_cdiff);
>> +        qemu_mod_timer(s->timer,
>> +                       update.now + next_cdiff * a9_gtimer_get_conv(s));
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (s->control & R_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE) {
>> +        s->counter = update.new;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (sync) {
>> +        s->cpu_ref_time = update.now;
>> +        s->ref_counter = s->counter;
>> +    }
>> +}
>
>
>
>> +
>> +static void a9_gtimer_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t value,
>> +                            unsigned size)
>> +{
>> +    A9GlobalTimerPerCPU *gtb = (A9GlobalTimerPerCPU *)opaque;
>> +    A9GlobalTimerState *s = gtb->parent;
>> +    int shift = 0;
>> +
>> +    DB_PRINT("addr:%#x data:%#08" PRIx64 "\n", (unsigned)addr, value);
>> +
>> +    switch (addr) {
>> +    case R_COUNTER_HI:
>> +        shift = 32;
>> +        /* fallthrough */
>> +    case R_COUNTER_LO:
>> +        /*
>> +         * Keep it simple - ARM docco explicitly says to disable timer 
>> before
>> +         * modding it, so dont bother trying to do all the difficult on the 
>> fly
>> +         * timer modifications - (if they even work in real hardware??).
>> +         */
>
> I'm pretty sure the remarks in the TRM are intended as a note to
> software authors about how to reliably modify the timer, given
> it's a 64 bit field that you can only write 32 bits at a time.
> I haven't tested but you'd probably have to go out of your way to
> make the h/w not just update the appropriate 32 bits...
> I'm happy with this log-and-do-nothing implementation though.
>
>> +        if (s->control & R_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE) {
>> +            qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "Cannot mod running ARM 
>> gtimer\n");
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +        s->counter = deposit64(s->counter, shift, 32, value);
>> +        return;
>
>> +static void a9_gtimer_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> +    A9GlobalTimerState *s = ARM_GTIMER(dev);
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    s->counter = 0;
>> +    s->control = 0;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
>> +        A9GlobalTimerPerCPU *gtb = &s->per_cpu[i];
>> +
>> +        gtb->control = 0;
>> +        gtb->status = 0;
>> +        gtb->compare = 0;
>
> Missing gtb->inc reset.
>

Fixed.

>> +    }
>> +    a9_gtimer_update(s, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void a9_gtimer_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    A9GlobalTimerState *s = ARM_GTIMER(dev);
>> +    SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    if (s->num_cpu < 1 || s->num_cpu > MAX_CPUS) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: num-cpu must be between 1 and %d\n",
>> +                   __func__, MAX_CPUS);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem, OBJECT(dev), &a9_gtimer_this_ops, s,
>> +                          "MMIO shared", 0x20);
>
> This makes the memory region pretty much anonymous in the debugger:
>
> (gdb) print s->iomem
> $1 = {ops = 0x555555dca4a0, iommu_ops = 0x0, opaque = 0x5555563e5ab0,
> owner = 0x0, parent = 0x0, size = {lo = 32,
>     hi = 0}, addr = 0, destructor = 0x5555559420d7
> <memory_region_destructor_none>,
>   ram_addr = 18446744073709551615, subpage = false, terminates = true,
> romd_mode = true, ram = false,
>   readonly = false, enabled = true, rom_device = false,
> warning_printed = false, flush_coalesced_mmio = false,
>   alias = 0x0, alias_offset = 0, priority = 0, may_overlap = false,
> subregions = {tqh_first = 0x0,
>     tqh_last = 0x5555563e7e50}, subregions_link = {tqe_next = 0x0,
> tqe_prev = 0x0}, coalesced = {tqh_first = 0x0,
>     tqh_last = 0x5555563e7e70}, name = 0x555556348620 "MMIO shared",
> dirty_log_mask = 0 '\000', ioeventfd_nb = 0,
>   ioeventfds = 0x0, iommu_notify = {notifiers = {lh_first = 0x0}}}
>
> which isn't very nice given that debugging is the main reason
> for naming MMIO regions. Can we have something slightly less
> ambiguous, please?
>

I was running on the assumption that Paolo's memory_region owner field
would be used to generate nice names for which IP owns the memory
region. Then this name is used for which region with the IP. But
fixed.

>> diff --git a/include/hw/timer/a9gtimer.h b/include/hw/timer/a9gtimer.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f4c1499
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/hw/timer/a9gtimer.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +#ifndef A9GTIMER_H
>> +#define A9GTIMER_H
>> +
>> +#include "qom/object.h"
>> +
>> +#define TYPE_ARM_GTIMER "arm.cortex-a9-global-timer"
>
> This doesn't match the name you pass to qdev_create() in patch 2,
> and so we assert on startup.
>

Fixed

>> +#define ARM_GTIMER(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(A9GlobalTimerState, (obj), 
>> TYPE_ARM_GTIMER)
>> +
>> +#define R_COUNTER_LO                0x00
>> +#define R_COUNTER_HI                0x04
>> +
>> +#define R_CONTROL                   0x08
>> +#define R_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE      (1 << 0)
>> +#define R_CONTROL_COMP_ENABLE       (1 << 1)
>> +#define R_CONTROL_IRQ_ENABLE        (1 << 2)
>> +#define R_CONTROL_AUTO_INCREMENT    (1 << 2)
>> +#define R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT   8
>> +#define R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_LEN     8
>> +#define R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK    (((1 << R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_LEN) - 1) 
>> << \
>> +                                     R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT)
>> +
>> +#define R_CONTROL_BANKED            (R_CONTROL_COMP_ENABLE | \
>> +                                     R_CONTROL_IRQ_ENABLE | \
>> +                                     R_CONTROL_AUTO_INCREMENT)
>> +#define R_CONTROL_NEEDS_SYNC        (R_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE | \
>> +                                     R_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK)
>> +
>> +#define R_INTERRUPT_STATUS          0x0C
>> +#define R_COMPARATOR_LO             0x10
>> +#define R_COMPARATOR_HI             0x14
>> +#define R_AUTO_INCREMENT            0x18
>
> Shouldn't most of these defines be in the .c file, given that
> they're only needed by the implementation, not by users of the
> device ?
>

My understanding is that programmers model belongs in the header for
the sake of qtest.

Regards,
Peter

> thanks
> -- PMM
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]