[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] i440fx-test: verify firmware under 4G an
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] i440fx-test: verify firmware under 4G and 1M, both -bios and -pflash |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:29:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130923 Thunderbird/17.0.9 |
Il 29/11/2013 16:30, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
>> > Zero-fill immediately followed by read. Suggest to drop memset().
> Same as above. memread() is unable to report errors. Some C library
> functions also require you to set errno to zero first, then call the
> function, then check errno, because some of the return values are
> overlapped by success and failure returns. For memread() there's no
> distinction in return value at all.
>
Errors in memread() will cause an assertion failure, but I think it's
okay to use g_malloc0.
That said, I agree that the common coding conventions (as well as the
English grammar) makes "char unsigned" look a bit weird.
Regarding usage of fixtures, I think it's within your artistic license
(quoting) and it's good to have an example to cut-and-paste from
Paolo.
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] i440fx-test: give each GTest case its own qtest, Laszlo Ersek, 2013/11/28
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] i440fx-test: check firmware visibility, Laszlo Ersek, 2013/11/28