qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] RESEND: [PATCHv2 0/6] ui/vnc: update optimizations


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RESEND: [PATCHv2 0/6] ui/vnc: update optimizations
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:20:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1

Am 04.12.2013 18:56, schrieb Peter Lieven:
> Ping
>
> Am 21.11.2013 09:51, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>> this series includes several optimizations for the ui/vnc guest to server 
>> and server to client
>> update cycles. comments/reviews appreciated.
>>
>> v1->v2: - new patches 2,4,5
>>         - patch3: added performance test [Anthony]
>>         - patch3: further optimized the vnc_update_client by searching for 
>> the next zero bit
>>           with find_next_zero_bit.
>>         - patch3: further optimized vnc_dpy_switch by using bitmap_set to 
>> mask bits dirty.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> Peter Lieven (6):
>>   ui/vnc: introduce VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT macro
>>   ui/vnc: derive cmp_bytes from VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT
>>   ui/vnc: optimize dirty bitmap tracking
>>   ui/vnc: optimize clearing in find_and_clear_dirty_height()
>>   ui/vnc: optimize setting in vnc_dpy_update()
>>   ui/vnc: disable adaptive update calculations if not needed
>>
>>  ui/vnc.c |  185 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>  ui/vnc.h |    9 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

Hallo Peter,

there was an e-mail from Eric which you might consider in a 2nd version
of your patch series.

Please check also your patches using scripts/checkpatch.pl. Some of them
currently produce warnings:

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 139 lines
checked0001-ui-vnc-introduce-VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT-macro.patch

total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 212 lines
checked0003-ui-vnc-optimize-dirty-bitmap-tracking.patch

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 17 lines
checked0005-ui-vnc-optimize-setting-in-vnc_dpy_update.patch

I think it would also be reasonable to fix the coding style for this
code location in a separate patch
before modifying the else statement, but maybe this is optional:

     else
-        w_lim = w - (w_lim % 16);
+        w_lim = w - (w_lim % VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT);


Viele Grüße

Stefan Weil




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]