qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] target-arm: A64: Fix vector register acce


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] target-arm: A64: Fix vector register access on bigendian hosts
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 07:03:03 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 12/28/2013 01:49 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>      if (size < 4) {
>          switch (size) {
>          case 0:
> -            tcg_gen_ld8u_i64(tmp, cpu_env, freg_offs);
> +            tcg_gen_ld8u_i64(tmp, cpu_env, fp_reg_offset(srcidx, MO_8));
>              break;
>          case 1:
> -            tcg_gen_ld16u_i64(tmp, cpu_env, freg_offs);
> +            tcg_gen_ld16u_i64(tmp, cpu_env, fp_reg_offset(srcidx, MO_16));
>              break;
>          case 2:
> -            tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(tmp, cpu_env, freg_offs);
> +            tcg_gen_ld32u_i64(tmp, cpu_env, fp_reg_offset(srcidx, MO_32));
>              break;
>          case 3:
> -            tcg_gen_ld_i64(tmp, cpu_env, freg_offs);
> +            tcg_gen_ld_i64(tmp, cpu_env, fp_reg_offset(srcidx, MO_64));
>              break;
>          }
>          tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64(tmp, tcg_addr, get_mem_index(s), MO_TE + size);

It occurs to me to wonder whether it wouldn't just be better to load the whole
64-bit quantity and store the piece we need, ignoring the entire host-endian 
issue.

I agree with the fp_reg_hi_offset helper, I just wonder if we ought not just
have a one-argument fp_reg_lo_offset helper instead of the sized one you 
introduce.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]