[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: enable x2apic by default on more r
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: enable x2apic by default on more recent CPU models |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:27:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 20.01.2014 15:36, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> This enables x2apic on the following CPU models: Conroe, Penryn,
> Nehalem, Westmere, Opteron_G[12345].
>
> Normally we try to keep the CPU model definitions as close as the real
> CPUs as possible, but x2apic can be emulated by KVM without host CPU
> support for x2apic, and it improves performance by reducing APIC access
> overhead. x2apic emulation is available on KVM since 2009 (Linux
> 2.6.32-rc1), there's no reason for not enabling x2apic by default when
> running KVM.
>
> About testing: Conroe, Penryn, Nehalem, Westemere and Opteron_G[123]
> have x2apic enabled on RHEL-6 since RHEL-6.0, so the presence of x2apic
> on those CPU models got lots of testing in the last few years. I want to
> eventually enable x2apic on all other CPU models as well, but it will
> require some testing to ensure it won't confuse guests.
>
> This shouldn't affect TCG at all because features not supported by TCG
> are automatically and silently disabled by QEMU when initializing the
> CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> ---
> v1 was sent in September 2013:
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/234541
>
> It got an Acked-by from Gleb but it was ignored by all maintainers.
Sorry, was still unread in my inbox. What changed between this version
and said v1? Just moving to _1_7? I.e. should I add back Gleb's Acked-by
before your Sob when applying?
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg