Re: [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code

[Fam Zheng]

On Wed, 01/22 17:53, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we've encountered a weird issue regarding monitor (qmp and hmp) behavior
> with qemu-1.7 (and qemu-1.5). The following steps will reproduce the issue:
> 
>     1) Client A connects to qmp socket with socat
>     2) Client A gets greeting message {"QMP": {"version": ..}
>     3) Client A waits (select on the socket's fd)
>     4) Client B tries to connect to the *same* qmp socket with socat
>     5) Client B does *NOT* get any greating message
>     6) Client B waits (select on the socket's fd)
>     7) Client B closes connection (kill socat)
>     8) Client A quits too
>     9) Client C connects to qmp socket
>     10) Client C gets *two* greeting messages!!!

Hi Stratos, thank you for debugging and reporting this.

I tested this sequence but can't fully reproduce this. What I see is 5) but no
10). Client C acts normally. And your patch below doesn't solve it for me.

To submit a patch, please follow instructions as described in
http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
so it could be picked up by maintainers. Specifically, you need to format your
patch email with "git format-patch" and add a "Signed-off-by:" line in your
patch email.

Thanks,

Fam

> 
> After some investigation, we traced it down to the monitor_flush()
> function in monitor.c. Specifically, when a second client connects to
> the qmp (client B), while another one is already using it (client A), we
> get the following from stracing the second client (client B):
> 
>     connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="foo.mon"}, 9) = 0
>     getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2]) = 0
>     select(4, [0 3], [1 3], [], NULL)       = 2 (out [1 3])
>     select(4, [0 3], [], [], NULL
> 
> So, the connect() syscall from client B succeeds, although client B
> connection has not yet been accepted by the qmp server (it's still in
> the backlog of the qmp listening socket).
> 
> After killing client B and then client A, we see the following when
> stracing the qemu proc:
> 
>     22363 accept4(6, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2], SOCK_CLOEXEC) = 9
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
>     22363 fstat(9, {st_mode=S_IFSOCK|0777, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x802 (flags
>     O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)
>     22363 write(9, "{\"QMP\": {\"version\": {\"qemu\": {\"m"..., 127) =
>     -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
>     22363 --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
> 
> The qmp server / qemu accepts the connection from client B (who has now
> closed the connection) and tries to write the greeting message to the
> socket fd. This results in write returning an error (EPIPE).
> 
> The monitor_flush() function doesn't seem to handle this case (write
> error). Instead, it adds a watch / handler to retry the write operation.
> Thus, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly, which results in duplicate
> greeting messages for the next client to connect.
> 
> The following seems to do the trick.
> 
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 845f608..5622f20 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
>  
>      if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
>          rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
> -        if (rc == len) {
> -            /* all flushed */
> +        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
> +            /* all flushed or error */
>              QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
>              mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
>              return;
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stratos
> 
> -- 
> Stratos Psomadakis
> <address@hidden>
>