qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] block: resize backing image during activ


From: Jeff Cody
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] block: resize backing image during active layer commit, if needed
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:18:30 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:05:26PM +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> Le Thursday 23 Jan 2014 à 16:48:56 (-0500), Jeff Cody a écrit :
> > If the top image to commit is the active layer, and also larger than
> > the base image, then an I/O error will likely be returned during
> > block-commit.
> > 
> > For instance, if we have a base image with a virtual size 10G, and a
> > active layer image of size 20G, then committing the snapshot via
> > 'block-commit' will likely fail.
> > 
> > This will automatically attempt to resize the base image, if the
> > active layer image to be committed is larger.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  block/mirror.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
> > index 2932bab..2a33aa6 100644
> > --- a/block/mirror.c
> > +++ b/block/mirror.c
> > @@ -630,11 +630,52 @@ void commit_active_start(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> > BlockDriverState *base,
> >                           BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb,
> >                           void *opaque, Error **errp)
> >  {
> > +    int64_t length, base_length;
> > +    int orig_base_flags;
> > +
> > +    orig_base_flags = bdrv_get_flags(base);
> > +
> >      if (bdrv_reopen(base, bs->open_flags, errp)) {
> >          return;
> >      }
> > +
> > +    length = bdrv_getlength(bs);
> > +    if (length < 0) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to determine length of %s", bs->filename);
> > +        goto error_restore_flags;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    base_length = bdrv_getlength(base);
> > +    if (base_length < 0) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to determine length of %s", 
> > base->filename);
> > +        goto error_restore_flags;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (length > base_length) {
> > +        if (bdrv_truncate(base, length) < 0) {
> > +            error_setg(errp, "Top image %s is larger than base image %s, 
> > and "
> > +                             "resize of base image failed",
> > +                             bs->filename, base->filename);
> > +            goto error_restore_flags;
> > +        }
> 
> 
> > +    } else if (length < 0) {
> > +        goto error_restore_flags;
> > +    }
> The code already test for (length < 0) ten lines above. Is this branch really
> needed ?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Benoît

Thanks - no, it is not needed.  I did not mean to have that there -
while harmless, it is essentially dead code and should be culled.
I'll submit a v4 to take care of that.

> 
> > +
> > +
> >      bdrv_ref(base);
> >      mirror_start_job(bs, base, speed, 0, 0,
> >                       on_error, on_error, cb, opaque, errp,
> >                       &commit_active_job_driver, false, base);
> > +    if (error_is_set(errp)) {
> > +        goto error_restore_flags;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return;
> > +
> > +error_restore_flags:
> > +    /* ignore error and errp for bdrv_reopen, because we want to propagate
> > +     * the original error */
> > +    bdrv_reopen(base, orig_base_flags, NULL);
> > +    return;
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]