qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 7/8] target-ppc: Add Load Quadword an


From: Tom Musta
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 7/8] target-ppc: Add Load Quadword and Reserve
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:01:10 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 1/27/2014 12:59 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 27.01.2014, at 18:54, Tom Musta <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> This patch adds the Load Quadword and Reserve (lqarx) instruction,
>> which is new in Power ISA 2.07.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Musta <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target-ppc/translate.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
>> index bb1dc82..589cee9 100644
>> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
>> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
>> @@ -3361,6 +3361,39 @@ STCX(stwcx_, 4);
>> /* ldarx */
>> LARX(ldarx, 8, ld64);
>>
>> +/* lqarx */
>> +static void gen_lqarx(DisasContext *ctx)
>> +{
>> +    TCGv EA;
>> +    int rd = rD(ctx->opcode);
>> +    TCGv gpr1, gpr2;
>> +
>> +    if (unlikely((rd & 1) || (rd == rA(ctx->opcode)) ||
>> +                 (rd == rB(ctx->opcode)))) {
>> +        gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_RES);
>> +    EA = tcg_temp_local_new();
>> +    gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, EA);
>> +    gen_check_align(ctx, EA, 15);
>> +    if (unlikely(ctx->le_mode)) {
>> +        gpr1 = cpu_gpr[rd+1];
>> +        gpr2 = cpu_gpr[rd];
>> +    } else {
>> +        gpr1 = cpu_gpr[rd];
>> +        gpr2 = cpu_gpr[rd+1];
>> +    }
>> +    gen_qemu_ld64(ctx, gpr1, EA);
>> +    tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_reserve, EA);
>> +    tcg_gen_st_tl(gpr1, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_val));
> 
> I suppose it's ok to only store the first 64bits as reserved?
> 
> 
> Alex
> 

Thank you, Alex.  It looks like there is some interesting code in 
linux-user/main.c that is impacted by lqarx/stqcx.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]