> So, even though I think this script is a very welcome addition, I don't
> think it helps settling the question of what to do with "info qtree".
> IMO there's no good reason to exclude busless devices from "info qtree",
> and it's a bug (of course less severe than crashing, but still a bug)
> that the busless nand device doesn't appear there.
Don't you see that that is unfixable? We may be able to replace info
qtree by an info qom-tree, which does the equivalent of this QMP-based
script, but qtree ues a completely different display hierarchy than QOM.