qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/20] Improve bdrv_open error messages


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/20] Improve bdrv_open error messages
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:31:42 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:03:33PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Most of the block drivers are not using the Error** argument to
> bdrv_open, and instead just printing errors to stderr.  This series
> improves that, using Error** instead of abusing errno numbers too.
> 
> The only hurdle (caught by qemu-iotests, too) is VMDK, where we
> currently parse a file first as image, and second as a descriptor.
> This makes it hard to pick a good error message, because you do not
> know which attempt gave the most reasonable error message.  For
> this reason patches 15-17 modify this approach and push up the
> detection of vmdk image file magic numbers.
> 
> Apart from this, and from a segfault fixed by patch 7, the series
> consists of mostly trivial patches.
> 
> Paolo
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (20):
>   nbd: produce a better error if neither host nor port is passed
>   nbd: correctly propagate errors
>   nbd: inline tcp_socket_incoming_spec into sole caller
>   nbd: move socket wrappers to qemu-nbd
>   iscsi: fix indentation
>   iscsi: correctly propagate errors in iscsi_open
>   gluster: default scheme to gluster:// and host to localhost.
>   gluster: correctly propagate errors
>   cow: correctly propagate errors
>   curl: correctly propagate errors
>   qcow: correctly propagate errors
>   qed: correctly propagate errors
>   vhdx: correctly propagate errors
>   vvfat: correctly propagate errors
>   vmdk: extract vmdk_read_desc
>   vmdk: push vmdk_read_desc up to caller
>   vmdk: do not try opening a file as both image and descriptor
>   vmdk: correctly propagate errors
>   block: do not abuse EMEDIUMTYPE
>   vdi: say why an image is bad
> 
>  block/bochs.c              |   3 +-
>  block/cow.c                |  15 ++---
>  block/curl.c               |  13 ++---
>  block/gluster.c            |  28 ++++-----
>  block/iscsi.c              | 141 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  block/nbd.c                |  43 +++++++-------
>  block/parallels.c          |   3 +-
>  block/qcow.c               |  19 +++---
>  block/qcow2.c              |   2 +-
>  block/qed.c                |  19 +++---
>  block/vdi.c                |  29 ++++++----
>  block/vhdx.c               |  21 +++----
>  block/vmdk.c               | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  block/vpc.c                |   3 +-
>  block/vvfat.c              |   9 +--
>  include/block/nbd.h        |   6 --
>  nbd.c                      |  66 ---------------------
>  qemu-nbd.c                 |  52 +++++++++++++++++
>  tests/qemu-iotests/059.out |   6 +-
>  19 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 297 deletions(-)

Looks good except for the memory leak that I commented on.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]