qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner: Don't overrun outp


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner: Don't overrun output_irq array in init
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:17:36 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

Am 17.02.2014 18:53, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> The Exynos4210 combiner has IIC_NIRQ inputs and IIC_NGRP outputs;
> use the correct constant in the loop initializing our output
> sysbus IRQs so that we don't overrun the output_irq[] array.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c b/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c
> index ef5e8eb..3287479 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int exynos4210_combiner_init(SysBusDevice *sbd)
>      qdev_init_gpio_in(dev, exynos4210_combiner_handler, IIC_NIRQ);
>  
>      /* Connect SysBusDev irqs to device specific irqs */
> -    for (i = 0; i < IIC_NIRQ; i++) {
> +    for (i = 0; i < IIC_NGRP; i++) {

Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>

It seems that IIC_NIRQ == IIC_NGRP * 8, so please don't forget to Cc
address@hidden in the commit message for 1.7.1.

Regards,
Andreas

>          sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->output_irq[i]);
>      }
>  

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]