qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v10 0/2] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v10 0/2] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:50:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

Am 25.02.2014 08:36, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Hello,
> 
> Here's my cleaned up version of slim x86 CPU subclasses.
> Second patch didn't get a lot of testing yet.
> 
> Loading cpudef is still in main initfn since otherwise the host type
> would need to be relocated. Can be cleaned up as follow-ups.
> 
> I wonder whether we are intentionally registering the host type even for
> !CONFIG_KVM? Instantiating it will then always lead to assertion failure.

Ping! Did anyone review or test? Still applies after new x2apic patches.

Andreas

> Available for testing here:
> git://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu.git qom-cpu-x86-subclasses.v10
> https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu-x86-subclasses.v10
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> v9 -> v10:
> * Cleaned up documentation comments.
> * Prepended patch to implement CPUClass::class_by_name(), rebased on it.
> * Cleaned up naming (..._class_init, ..._initfn, type vs. class).
> * Dropped duplicate white line.
> * Dropped unnecessary .abstract, .instance_size, .class_size fields.
> * Aligned model type registration with other targets by having the
>   registration function operate on one model only.
> * Relocated cpudef-based types to after x86_cpu_load_cpudef().
> * Moved assignment of cpu_def into cpudef-specific class_init.
> 
> (went through various hands, last ehabkost's)
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> * Instead of re-coding all CPU definitions as class_init functions, leave
>   the built-in definition array in place and place x86_def_t in the class.
> * Use kvm_arch_init() hook to assure class_init succeeds for -cpu host.
>   Suggested by Eduardo.
> 
> v1-> v2:
> * Instead of turning x86_def_t into X86CPUInfo to initialize classes,
>   drop it completely and register types manually with customizable TypeInfos
> * Use new list facilities for printing -cpu ? models
> * Adopt new name scheme suggested by Eduardo and ideas from my alpha series
> * Keep short names in -cpu ? output for alignment reasons
> * Merge cpu_x86_init() into cpu.c:cpu_x86_register()
> * Append patch showing Haswell as subclass of SandyBridge
> 
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Cc: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
> 
> Andreas Färber (1):
>   target-i386: Prepare CPUClass::class_by_name for X86CPU
> 
> Eduardo Habkost (1):
>   target-i386: X86CPU model subclasses
> 
>  target-i386/cpu-qom.h |  15 ++++
>  target-i386/cpu.c     | 197 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]