qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] tests/libqtest: Fix possible deadlock in


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] tests/libqtest: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:40:22 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:09:09PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> @@ -78,12 +79,16 @@ static int socket_accept(int sock)
>      struct sockaddr_un addr;
>      socklen_t addrlen;
>      int ret;
> +    struct timeval timeout = { .tv_sec = SOCKET_TIMEOUT,
> +                               .tv_usec = 0 };
> +
> +    setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, (void *)&timeout,
> +               sizeof(timeout));
>  
>      addrlen = sizeof(addr);
>      do {
>          ret = accept(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &addrlen);
>      } while (ret == -1 && errno == EINTR);
> -    g_assert_no_errno(ret);
>      close(sock);

Did you mean to leave SO_RCVTIMEO set after this function completes?

> @@ -91,7 +96,7 @@ static int socket_accept(int sock)
>  
>  static void kill_qemu(QTestState *s)
>  {
> -    if (s->qemu_pid != -1) {
> +    if (s && s->qemu_pid != -1) {
>          kill(s->qemu_pid, SIGTERM);
>          waitpid(s->qemu_pid, NULL, 0);
>      }

This is a bug in libqtest.c, please don't silence the crash.

kill_qemu() gets called from the SIGABRT signal handler but I forgot
that global_qtest isn't initialized yet while qtest_init() executes.

In other words, the cleanup is broken if we fail inside qtest_init().
Can you drop this hunk and I'll send a patch to fix the underlying
issue?

> @@ -153,6 +158,8 @@ QTestState *qtest_init(const char *extra_args)
>      g_free(socket_path);
>      g_free(qmp_socket_path);
>  
> +    g_assert(s->fd >= 0 && s->qmp_fd >= 0);
> +

We probably shouldn't socket_accept() s->qmp_fd if s->fd already failed.
Otherwise we'll wait another 5 seconds for the timeout to explire:

    s->fd = socket_accept(sock);
    if (s->fd >= 0) {
        s->qmp_fd = socket_accept(qmpsock);
    }



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]