[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables)
|
From: |
Gabriel L. Somlo |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:01:16 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:36:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> After memory hotplug is in I might add e820 entries after above_4g
> for present at boot hotpluggable DIMMDevices. They would have 1:1 mapping
> i.e. t19<-t20<-t17 and belong only to 1 node.
Any idea what the max size could be for each one of those ?
Thanks,
--Gabriel
- [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel L. Somlo, 2014/03/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gerd Hoffmann, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel L. Somlo, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Igor Mammedov, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables),
Gabriel L. Somlo <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Igor Mammedov, 2014/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel Somlo, 2014/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Igor Mammedov, 2014/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel Somlo, 2014/03/14