[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables)
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables) |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:28:30 +0100 |
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:01:16 -0400
"Gabriel L. Somlo" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:36:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >
> > After memory hotplug is in I might add e820 entries after above_4g
> > for present at boot hotpluggable DIMMDevices. They would have 1:1 mapping
> > i.e. t19<-t20<-t17 and belong only to 1 node.
>
> Any idea what the max size could be for each one of those ?
So far there isn't anything to limit max size of a DEIMMDevice except of
allowed max RAM size on QEMU CLI at startup time.
>
> Thanks,
> --Gabriel
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Igor
- [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel L. Somlo, 2014/03/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gerd Hoffmann, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel L. Somlo, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Igor Mammedov, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel L. Somlo, 2014/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables),
Igor Mammedov <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel Somlo, 2014/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Igor Mammedov, 2014/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMBIOS vs. NUMA (was: Build full type 19 tables), Gabriel Somlo, 2014/03/14