qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: Update netdev peer on link change


From: Vlad Yasevich
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: Update netdev peer on link change
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:57:08 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

On 04/02/2014 06:46 AM, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> 
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:05:51PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> When a link change occurs on a backend (like tap), we currently do
>>> not propage such change to the nic.  As a result, when someone turns
>>> off a link on a tap device, for instance, then a guest doesn't see
>>> that change and continues to try to send traffic or run DHCP even
>>> though the lower-layer is disconnected.  This is OK when the network
>>> is set up as a HUB since the the guest may be connected to other HUB
>>> ports too, but when it's set up as a netdev, it makes thinkgs worse.
>>>
>>> The patch addresses this by setting the peers link down only when the
>>> peer is not a HUBPORT device.  With this patch, in the following config
>>>  -netdev tap,id=net0 -device e1000,mac=XXXXX,netdev=net0
>>> when net0 link is turned off, the guest e1000 shows lower-layer link
>>> down. This allows guests to boot much faster in such configurations.
>>> With windows guest, it also allows the network to recover properly
>>> since windows will not configure the link-local IPv4 address, and
>>> when the link is turned on, the proper address address is configured.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> net/net.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
>>> index 0a88e68..8a084bf 100644
>>> --- a/net/net.c
>>> +++ b/net/net.c
>>> @@ -1065,15 +1065,23 @@ void qmp_set_link(const char *name, bool up, Error 
>>> **errp)
>>>         nc->info->link_status_changed(nc);
>>>     }
>>>
>>> -    /* Notify peer. Don't update peer link status: this makes it possible 
>>> to
>>> -     * disconnect from host network without notifying the guest.
>>> -     * FIXME: is disconnected link status change operation useful?
>>> -     *
>>> -     * Current behaviour is compatible with qemu vlans where there could be
>>> -     * multiple clients that can still communicate with each other in
>>> -     * disconnected mode. For now maintain this compatibility. */
>>
>> Hmm this went in without much discussion.
>>
>> But before this change went in, it was possible to control link state on NIC
>> and on link separately, without guest noticing.
>>
>> Why did we decide to drop this functionality?
> 
> Not sure there was a real need for the patch.
> 
> On other hand Windows guest will not receive IP address from DHCP server if 
> you start VM with tap link down and then set it to up without toggling link 
> state of the guest device as well.

Same for a linux guest.  It a fault scenario.  So we either handle
it by propagating the link event, or we forbid it.  Doing neither
allows for a bad state in common configuration.

This patch chose to propagate the event under certain configuration.

-vlad

> 
> Yan. 
> 
>>
>>
>>
>>> -    if (nc->peer && nc->peer->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> -        nc->peer->info->link_status_changed(nc->peer);
>>> +    if (nc->peer) {
>>> +        /* Change peer link only if the peer is NIC and then notify peer.
>>> +         * If the peer is a HUBPORT or a backend, we do not change the
>>> +         * link status.
>>> +         *
>>> +         * This behavior is compatible with qemu vlans where there could be
>>> +         * multiple clients that can still communicate with each other in
>>> +         * disconnected mode. For now maintain this compatibility.
>>> +         */
>>> +        if (nc->peer->info->type == NET_CLIENT_OPTIONS_KIND_NIC) {
>>> +            for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>>> +                ncs[i]->peer->link_down = !up;
>>> +            }
>>> +        }
>>> +        if (nc->peer->info->link_status_changed) {
>>> +            nc->peer->info->link_status_changed(nc->peer);
>>> +        }
>>>     }
>>> }
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.4.2
>>>
>>
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]