qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 28/35] pc: propagate memory hotplug event to ACP


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 28/35] pc: propagate memory hotplug event to ACPI device
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 18:21:14 +0300

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:26:02PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:13:01 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:07:53PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > > On 04/05/2014 12:36 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > Notify PIIX4_PM/ICH9LPC device about hotplug event,
> > > > so that it would send SCI to guest notifying about
> > > > newly added memory.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > >  hw/i386/pc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > index 734c6ee..ee5cf88 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> > > > @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@
> > > >  #include "acpi-build.h"
> > > >  #include "hw/mem/dimm.h"
> > > >  #include "trace.h"
> > > > +#include "hw/acpi/piix4.h"
> > > > +#include "hw/i386/ich9.h"
> > > >  
> > > >  /* debug PC/ISA interrupts */
> > > >  //#define DEBUG_IRQ
> > > > @@ -1484,6 +1486,8 @@ void qemu_register_pc_machine(QEMUMachine *m)
> > > >  static void pc_dimm_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > > >                           DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > >  {
> > > > +    Object *acpi_dev;
> > > > +    HotplugHandlerClass *hhc;
> > > >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> > > >      PCMachineState *pcms = PC_MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
> > > >      DimmDevice *dimm = DIMM(dev);
> > > > @@ -1517,10 +1521,19 @@ static void pc_dimm_plug(HotplugHandler 
> > > > *hotplug_dev,
> > > >      }
> > > >      trace_mhp_pc_dimm_assigned_slot(dimm->slot);
> > > >  
> > > > +    acpi_dev = (acpi_dev = piix4_pm_find()) ? acpi_dev : ;
> ;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > wow. just wow.
> > 
> > I had to read the C99 spec to find out if this was safe.  :-)
> > 
> > But I believe it is readable, I wouldn't mind keeping it that way.
> > 
> I'll change it to a less obscure form:
> 
> acpi_dev = piix4_pm_find();
> if (!acpi_dev) {
>     acpi_dev = ich9_lpc_find();
> }


or

    Object *piix = piix4_pm_find();
    Object *lpc = ich9_lpc_find();
    assert(!!piix != !!lpc);


so we verify it's one of the other.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]